W3C

Results of Questionnaire ACT TF - Rule Review: Element with lang attribute has valid language tag

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: team-wcag-act-surveys@w3.org,maryjom@us.ibm.com,wilco.fiers@deque.com

This questionnaire was open from 2020-12-02 to 2021-01-07.

6 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Instructions
  2. Consistency with ACT Rules Format
  3. Rule assumptions
  4. Implementation data
  5. Consistent with accessibility requirements
  6. Remaining open issues
  7. Other questions or concerns
  8. Rule is up-to-date
  9. Readiness for publishing

1. Instructions

Review the rule Element with lang attribute has valid language tag which updated to resolve Issue 431. Answer the questions in this survey.

If there are issues with the rule, you may either open an issue in GitHub or provide details in the entry fields for the applicable question.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results

Details

Responder Instructions
Detlev Fischer
Wilco Fiers
Kathy Eng
Trevor Bostic
Levon Spradlin
Mary Jo Mueller

2. Consistency with ACT Rules Format

Does the rule follow the ACT Rules Format 1.0?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 6
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below.
I don't know. My questions are documented below.

Details

Responder Consistency with ACT Rules FormatComments
Detlev Fischer Yes
Wilco Fiers Yes
Kathy Eng Yes
Trevor Bostic Yes
Levon Spradlin Yes
Mary Jo Mueller Yes

3. Rule assumptions

Are the assumptions acceptable?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 6
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below.
I don't know. My questions are documented below.

Details

Responder Rule assumptionsComments
Detlev Fischer Yes
Wilco Fiers Yes
Kathy Eng Yes
Trevor Bostic Yes
Levon Spradlin Yes
Mary Jo Mueller Yes

4. Implementation data

Is the implementation data correct?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 6
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below.
I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below.

Details

Responder Implementation dataComments
Detlev Fischer Yes
Wilco Fiers Yes
Kathy Eng Yes
Trevor Bostic Yes
Levon Spradlin Yes
Mary Jo Mueller Yes

5. Consistent with accessibility requirements

Is the rule consistent with existing accessibility standards (e.g. WCAG, ARIA, etc.)?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 5
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below.
I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below.

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Consistent with accessibility requirementsComments
Detlev Fischer
Wilco Fiers Yes
Kathy Eng Yes
Trevor Bostic Yes
Levon Spradlin Yes
Mary Jo Mueller Yes

6. Remaining open issues

Are there any remaining open issues for this rule that were opened prior to this review?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes there are open issues that need to be resolved. I have listed them below.
Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. 3
No, there are no open issues. 3

Details

Responder Remaining open issuesComments
Detlev Fischer No, there are no open issues.
Wilco Fiers Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. Anne opened this issue a few weeks back. Don't think it's essential to resolve this:
https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/1499
Kathy Eng Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/1499
Trevor Bostic No, there are no open issues.
Levon Spradlin No, there are no open issues.
Mary Jo Mueller Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. There are 3 open issues: 1525 (https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/1525), 1520 (https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/1520), and 1499 (https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/1499). Not sure if any of these are required to be fixed prior to publishing.

7. Other questions or concerns

Do you have any further questions or concerns about this rule?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below. 1
No, I have no further questions or concerns. 5

Details

Responder Other questions or concernsComments
Detlev Fischer No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Wilco Fiers No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Kathy Eng Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below. Does the applicability include alt= value? For example, an English page with an image of French words, with alt in French

Also, can the Description be shortened to This rule checks that a non-empty lang attribute of an element in the page body has a valid primary language subtag.
Trevor Bostic No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Levon Spradlin No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Mary Jo Mueller No, I have no further questions or concerns. I do like Kathy's change in the description. She also brings up an interesting question. Is there a way to mark up alt text with a lang tag?

8. Rule is up-to-date

Is the rule up to date? If so, the accessibility support should still be relevant, it should follow the recommended writing style, and use up to date links.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes, all information is up-to-date. 6
No, it needs the following changes.
I don't know, but I have the following concerns.

Details

Responder Rule is up-to-dateComments
Detlev Fischer Yes, all information is up-to-date.
Wilco Fiers Yes, all information is up-to-date.
Kathy Eng Yes, all information is up-to-date.
Trevor Bostic Yes, all information is up-to-date.
Levon Spradlin Yes, all information is up-to-date.
Mary Jo Mueller Yes, all information is up-to-date.

9. Readiness for publishing

Do you think this rule is ready to be published?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. 3
Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. 3
No, it is not ready to publish and the reason is documented below.

Details

Responder Readiness for publishingComments
Detlev Fischer Yes, it is ready to publish as-is.
Wilco Fiers Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. I opened a small PR to change the inapplicable examples:
https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/pull/1519
Kathy Eng Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. #7 comments
Trevor Bostic Yes, it is ready to publish as-is.
Levon Spradlin Yes, it is ready to publish as-is.
Mary Jo Mueller Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. May need small tweaks, depending on the need to fix open issues and Kathy's suggestions.

More details on responses

  • Detlev Fischer: last responded on 2, December 2020 at 18:26 (UTC)
  • Wilco Fiers: last responded on 15, December 2020 at 13:47 (UTC)
  • Kathy Eng: last responded on 16, December 2020 at 00:42 (UTC)
  • Trevor Bostic: last responded on 6, January 2021 at 22:42 (UTC)
  • Levon Spradlin: last responded on 6, January 2021 at 23:29 (UTC)
  • Mary Jo Mueller: last responded on 7, January 2021 at 13:58 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Katie Haritos-Shea
  2. David MacDonald
  3. Romain Deltour
  4. Chris Loiselle
  5. Jonathan Avila
  6. Rachael Bradley Montgomery
  7. Charles Adams
  8. Daniel Montalvo
  9. Todd Libby
  10. Thomas Brunet
  11. Catherine Droege
  12. Suji Sreerama
  13. Shane Dittmar
  14. Nayan Padrai

Send an email to all the non-responders.


Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire