Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
An older couple enjoying Regent’s Park, London, in May. For the week ending 17 July excess deaths for England Wales were 3% below the five-year average.
An older couple enjoying Regent’s Park, London, in May. For the week ending 17 July excess deaths for England Wales were 3% below the five-year average. Photograph: Jo Hale/Getty Images
An older couple enjoying Regent’s Park, London, in May. For the week ending 17 July excess deaths for England Wales were 3% below the five-year average. Photograph: Jo Hale/Getty Images

Why are weekly deaths in Wales and England now below average?

This article is more than 3 years old

Experts attribute fewer excess deaths to ‘displaced mortality’

Displaced mortality – where deaths that would have occurred later in the year happen earlier for an unusual reason – could explain why the excess number of deaths in England and Wales has dropped below the five-year average for the fifth consecutive week, experts say.

Excess deaths compare the number of deaths in a given week with the five-year average for that week. They are considered the most reliable measure of the impact of Covid-19.

There have now been almost 58,000 excess deaths since the first coronavirus-related deaths were reported in England and Wales, data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) shows.

At the height of the pandemic, deaths were consistently above average, and reached double their usual number for two weeks in April.

However, as the first wave of Covid deaths has declined, the trend has reversed, with lower than average deaths reported for five weeks in a row.

The number of deaths registered was 3% below the five-year average in the week ending 17 July (week 29), the figures show. In that week the number of deaths attributed to Covid-19 dropped to 295 – the lowest death toll reported for 17 weeks. Experts say this could be due to “displaced mortality”.

Excess deaths England and Wales
Excess deaths England and Wales

Sarah Caul, the head of mortality at the ONS, said: “It could be that we’re seeing a dip below average because people died earlier than they would have usually, because we saw such a big excess [earlier in the pandemic].

“Because Covid particularly affects the most vulnerable, those who were potentially likely to die during this current period may have already died.”

More than 90% of patients who died from Covid-19 were aged over 60, ONS figures show. Data from NHS England shows that a similar proportion of those who died in hospital had an existing health condition before infection.

In a blogpost for the ONS, Caul wrote that longer-term mortality trends might also be causing this discrepancy.

“Another reason why the number of deaths may continue to fall below the average is due to the fall in the number of deaths experienced in recent periods before the start of the pandemic.

“The number of deaths registered in 2019 was 2% lower than 2018, and as mentioned earlier, we saw the number of death registrations fall below average for the start of 2020. Deaths falling below average could be a continuation of this trend.”

The ONS issued a note of caution over fatality figures for recent weeks, because the figures could later be revised due to a lag in death registrations. This means the full impact of lockdown on people’s health remains uncertain, particularly in the case of deaths due to suicide or substance abuse, which can take a long time to confirm.

Most viewed

Most viewed