Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton December 1, 2022

Islands, expressiveness, and the theory/formalism confusion

  • Rui P. Chaves EMAIL logo and Michael T. Putnam
From the journal Theoretical Linguistics

Corresponding author: Rui P. Chaves, Linguistics Department, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, 609 Baldy Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260-1030, USA, E-mail:

References

Abeillé, Anne, Barbara Hemforth, Elodie Winckel & Edward Gibson. 2020. Extraction from subjects: Differences in acceptability depend on the discourse function of the construction. Cognition 204. 104293.10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104293Search in Google Scholar

Abrusán, Márta. 2014. Weak island semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199639380.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Blank, Idan, Zuzanna Balewski, Kyle Mahowald & Evelina Fedorenko. 2016. Syntactic processing is distributed across the language system. NeuroImage 127. 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.069.Search in Google Scholar

Bondevik, Ingrid. 2018. Investigating the universality of adjunct islands through formal acceptability experiments – A comparative study of English and Norwegian. Norwegian University of Science and Technology Master thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Boston, Marisa Ferrara. 2012. A computational model of cognitive constraints in syntactic locality. Cornell University PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Carpenter, Bob. 1992. The logic of typed feature structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511530098Search in Google Scholar

Carroll, John. 1994. Relating complexity to practical performance in parsing with wide-coverage unification grammars. ACL 32. 287–294.10.3115/981732.981772Search in Google Scholar

Chaves, Rui P. 2012. On the grammar of extraction and coordination. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30. 465–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9164-y.Search in Google Scholar

Chaves, Rui P. & Jeruen E. Dery. 2014. Nobody expects tensed subject parasitic gaps. In 21st International head-driven phrase structure grammar conference. University at Buffalo.Search in Google Scholar

Chaves, Rui P. & Jeruen E. Dery. 2019. Frequency effects in subject islands. Journal of Linguistics 55. 475–521. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226718000294.Search in Google Scholar

Chaves, Rui P. & Adriana King. 2020. A usage-based account of subextraction effects. Journal of Cognitive Linguistics 30. 719–750.10.1515/cog-2018-0135Search in Google Scholar

Chaves, Rui P. & Michael T. Putnam. 2021. Unbounded dependency constructions: Theoretical and experimental perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198784999.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.21236/AD0616323Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In Stephen Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 232–286. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Reply to comments of Thompson. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences 295. 277–281.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, David Michaels, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–165. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7713.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Chung, Sandra & James McCloskey. 1983. On the interpretation of certain island facts in GPSG. Linguistic Inquiry 14. 703–714.Search in Google Scholar

Collins, Chris & Edward Stabler. 2016. A formalization of minimalist syntax. Syntax 19. 43–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12117.Search in Google Scholar

Culicover, Peter W. 1999. Syntactic nuts: Hard cases in syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198700241.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Culicover, Peter W., Giuseppe Varaschin & Susanne. Winkler. 2022. The radical unacceptability hypothesis: Accounting for unacceptability without universal constraints. Languages 7, 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020096.Search in Google Scholar

Culicover, Peter W. & Susanne. Winkler. 2022. Parasitic gaps aren’t parasitic, or, the case of the Uninvited Guest. The Linguistic Review 39. 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2021-2080.Search in Google Scholar

Deane, Paul. 1991. Limits to attention: A cognitive theory of island phenomena. Cognitive Linguistics 2. 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1991.2.1.1.Search in Google Scholar

Dillon, Brian & Norbert Hornstein. 2013. On the structural nature of island constraints. In Jon Sprouse & Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Experimental syntax and islands effects, 208–220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139035309.011Search in Google Scholar

Do, Monica L. & Elsi. Kaiser. 2017. The relationship between syntactic satiation and syntactic priming: A first look. Frontiers in Psychology 8. 1851. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01851.Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew. 2006. Functionalism and the theory – Metalanguage confusion. In Grace Wiebe, Gary Libben, Tom Priestly, Ron Smyth & Sam Wang (eds.), Phonology, morphology, and the empirical imperative: Papers in Honour of Bruce Derwing, 27–59. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 2006. Bridge phenomena. In Martin Everaert, Henk Van Riemsdijk, Rob Goedemans & Bart Hollebrandse (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. 5, 284–294. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996591.ch10Search in Google Scholar

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi & Shalom Lappin. 1979. Dominance and the functional explanation of island phenomena. Theoretical Linguistics 6. 41–86. https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.1979.6.1-3.41.Search in Google Scholar

Francis, Elaine J. 2022. Gradient acceptability and linguistic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780192898944.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Frank, Robert. 2002. Phrase structure composition and syntactic dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5366.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Frank, Robert. 2006. Phase theory and tree adjoining grammar. Lingua 116. 145–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.02.005.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, Edward, Barbara Hemforth, Elodie Winckel & Anne Abeillé. 2021. Acceptability of extraction out of adjuncts depends on discourse factors, 34th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Goodall, Grant. 2011. Syntactic satiation and the inversion effect in English and Spanish wh- questions. Syntax 14. 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2010.00148.x.Search in Google Scholar

Grosu, Alexander. 1981. Approaches to island phenomena. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Search in Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane, Ángel L. Jiménez-Fernández & Andrew Radford. 2013. Deconstructing the Subject Condition: Cumulative constraint violation and tolerance thresholds. The Linguistic Review 31. 73–150.10.1515/tlr-2013-0022Search in Google Scholar

Hale, John T. 2014. Automaton theories of human sentence comprehension. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Hofmeister, Philip, T. Florian Jaeger, Ivan A. Sag, Inbal Arnon & Neal Snider. 2007. Locality and accessibility in wh-questions. In Sam Featherston & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), Roots: Linguistics in search of its evidential base, 185–206. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198621.185Search in Google Scholar

Hofmeister, Philip, T. Florian Jaeger, Inbal Arnon, Ivan A. Sag & Neal Snider. 2013. The source ambiguity problem: Distinguishing the effects of grammar and processing on acceptability judgments. Language & Cognitive Processes 28. 48–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.572401.Search in Google Scholar

Hofmeister, Philip & Ivan A. Sag. 2010. Cognitive constraints and island effects. Language 86. 366–415. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0223.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. MIT PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Joshi, Aravind K. 1985. Tree adjoining grammars: How much context-sensitivity is required to provide reasonable structural descriptions? In David R. Dowty, Lauri Karttunen & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds.), Natural language parsing, 206–250. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511597855.007Search in Google Scholar

Kepser, Stephan & Uwe Mönnich. 2003. (Un-)Decidability results for head-driven phrase structure grammar. AMiLP 3. 141–152.Search in Google Scholar

Kluender, Robert. 1998. On the distinction between strong islands and weak islands: A processing perspective. In Peter W. Culicover & Louise McNally (eds.), Syntax and semantics 29: The limits of syntax, 241–279. New York, NY: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004373167_010Search in Google Scholar

Kohrt, Annika, Trey Sorensen, Peter O’Neill & Dustin A. Chacón. 2020. Inactive gap formation: An ERP study on the processing of extraction from adjunct clauses. In LSA 2020 annual meeting.10.3765/plsa.v5i1.4775Search in Google Scholar

Kroch, Anthony. 1987. Unbounded dependencies and subjacency in a tree adjoining grammar. In A. Manaster-Ramer (ed.), The mathematics of language, 143–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.35.09kroSearch in Google Scholar

Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Asymmetries in long distance extraction in a tree adjoining grammar. In M. Baltin & A. Kroch (eds.), Alternative conceptions of phrase structure, 66–98. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.2307/414731Search in Google Scholar

Kush, David, Akira Omaki & Norbert Hornstein. 2013. Microvariation in islands? In Jon Sprouse & Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Experimental syntax and island effects, 239–264. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139035309.013Search in Google Scholar

Levine, Robert D. & Thomas E. Hukari. 2006. The unity of unbounded dependency constructions. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

McCawley, James D. 1981. The syntax and semantics of English relative clauses. Lingua 53. 99–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(81)90014-0.Search in Google Scholar

Michaelis, Jens. 2001. Transforming linear context-free rewriting systems intominimalist grammars. In Philippe de Groote, Glyn Morrill & Christian Retore (eds.), Logical aspects of computational linguistics: 4th International conference, 228–244. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/3-540-48199-0_14Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Christiane. 2017. Extraction from adjunct islands in Swedish. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 35. 67–85.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Christiane & Clara Ulrich Eggers. 2022. Island extractions in the wild: A corpus study of adjunct and relative clause islands in Danish and English. Languages 7. 125.10.3390/languages7020125Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Stefan. 2015. The CoreGram project: Theoretical linguistics, theory development and verification. Journal of Language Modelling 3. 21–86.10.15398/jlm.v3i1.91Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Stefan. 2017. Head-driven phrase structure grammar, sign-based construction grammar, and fluid construction grammar: Commonalities and differences. Constructions and Frames 9. 139–174.10.1075/cf.9.1.05mulSearch in Google Scholar

Müller, Stefan, Anne Abeillé, Robert D. Borsley & Jean-Pierre Koenig (eds.). 2021. Head driven phrase structure grammar. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2016. Nonsyntactic explanations of island constraints. Annual Review of Linguistics 2. 187–210. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040707.Search in Google Scholar

Peters, P. Stanley & Robert W. Ritchie. 1973. On the generative power of transformational grammars. Information Sciences 6. 49–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(73)90027-3.Search in Google Scholar

Pollard, Carl. 1996. The nature of constraint-based grammar. Paper delivered at the Pacific Asia conference on language information, and computation. Seoul, Korea: Kyung Hee University.Search in Google Scholar

Pollard, Carl & Ivan A. Sag. 1994. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pylkkänen, Liina. 2019. The neural basis of combinatory syntax and semantics. Science 366. 62–66.10.1126/science.aax0050Search in Google Scholar

Rambow, Owen & K. Vijay-Shanker. 1998. Wh-islands in TAG and related formalisms. In Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on tree adjoining grammars and related frameworks (TAG+4), 147–150. University of Pennsylvania: Institute for Research in Cognitive Science.Search in Google Scholar

Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT PhD dissertation [Published in 1986 as Infinite Syntax! Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing].Search in Google Scholar

Sag, Ivan A., Hofmeister Philip & Snider Neal. 2009. Processing complexity in subjacency violations: The complex noun phrase constraint. CLS 43. 215–229.Search in Google Scholar

Sauerland, Uli & Paul D. Elbourne. 2002. Total reconstruction, PF movement, and derivational order. Linguistic Inquiry 33. 283–319. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438902317406722.Search in Google Scholar

Shafiei, Nazila & Thomas Graf. 2020. The subregular complexity of syntactic islands. SCiL 3. 272–281.Search in Google Scholar

Snyder, William. 2000. An experimental investigation of syntactic satiation effects. Linguistic Inquiry 31. 575–582. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554479.Search in Google Scholar

Snyder, William. 2022. On the nature of syntactic satiation. Languages 7. 38.10.3390/languages7010038Search in Google Scholar

Sprouse, Jon, Ivano Caponigro, Ciro Greco & Carlo Cecchetto. 2016. Experimental syntax and the variation of island effects in English and Italian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34. 307–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9286-8.Search in Google Scholar

Stabler, Edward. 1997. Derivational Minimalism. In Christian, Retoré (ed.), Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics, 68–95. Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/BFb0052152Search in Google Scholar

Steedman, Mark. 2001. The syntactic process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6591.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Steedman, Mark & Jason Baldrige. 2011. Combinatory categorial grammar. In Robert Borsley & K. Borjars (eds.), Non-transformational syntax, 181–224. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444395037.ch5Search in Google Scholar

Tollan, Rebecca & Daphna Heller. 2016. Elvis presley on an island: wh dependency formation inside complex NPs. NELS 46.Search in Google Scholar

Truswell, Robert. 2011. Events, phrases and questions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577774.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Villata, Sandra, Jon Sprouse & Whitney Tabor. 2019. Modeling ungrammaticality: A self-organizing model of islands. In Proceedings of the 41st annual meeting of the cognitive science society, 1178–1184.Search in Google Scholar

Vincent, Jake W., Ivy Sichel & Matthew W. Wagers. 2022. Extraction from English RCs and cross-linguistic similarities in the environments that facilitate extraction. Languages 7. 117.10.3390/languages7020117Search in Google Scholar

Weir, David Jeremy. 1988. Characterizing mildly context-sensitive grammar formalisms. University of Pennsylvania PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina. 2014. The universal structure of categories: Towards a formal typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139833899Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-06-10
Accepted: 2022-07-10
Published Online: 2022-12-01
Published in Print: 2022-10-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/tl-2022-2041/html
Scroll to top button