skip to main content
research-article

SATURN: A Thin and Flexible Self-powered Microphone Leveraging Triboelectric Nanogenerator

Published:05 July 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We demonstrate the design, fabrication, evaluation, and use of a self-powered microphone that is thin, flexible, and easily manufactured. Our technology is referred to as a Self-powered Audio Triboelectric Ultra-thin Rollable Nanogenerator (SATURN) microphone. This acoustic sensor takes advantage of the triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) to transform vibrations into an electric signal without applying an external power source. The sound quality of the SATURN mic, in terms of acoustic sensitivity, frequency response, and directivity, is affected by a set of design parameters that we explore based on both theoretical simulation and empirical evaluation. The major advantage of this audio material sensor is that it can be manufactured simply and deployed easily to convert every-day objects and physical surfaces into microphones which can sense audio. We explore the space of potential applications for such a material as part of a self-sustainable interactive system.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Roberto Aimi. 2007. Percussion instruments using realtime convolution: Physical controllers. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on New interfaces for musical expression. ACM, 154--159. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Thiago AL Burgo, Telma RD Ducati, Kelly R Francisco, Karl J Clinckspoor, Fernando Galembeck, and Sergio E Galembeck. 2012. Triboelectricity: macroscopic charge patterns formed by self-arraying ions on polymer surfaces. Langmuir 28, 19 (2012), 7407--7416.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Jun Chen, Guang Zhu, Weiqing Yang, Qingshen Jing, Peng Bai, Ya Yang, Te-Chien Hou, and Zhong Lin Wang. 2013. Harmonic-resonator-based triboelectric nanogenerator as a sustainable power source and a self-powered active vibration sensor. Advanced materials 25, 42 (2013), 6094--6099.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Tanzeem Choudhury and Alex Pentland. 2003. Sensing and modeling human networks using the sociometer. IEEE, 216.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Mary T Cord, Rauna K Surr, Brian E Walden, and Laurel Olson. 2002. Performance of directional microphone hearing aids in everyday life. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 13, 6 (2002), 295--307.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Kai Dong, Jianan Deng, Yunlong Zi, Yi-Cheng Wang, Cheng Xu, Haiyang Zou, Wenbo Ding, Yejing Dai, Bohong Gu, Baozhong Sun, et al. 2017. 3D Orthogonal Woven Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Effective Biomechanical Energy Harvesting and as Self-Powered Active Motion Sensors. Advanced Materials 29, 38 (2017), 1702648.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. John Eargle. 2012. The Microphone Book: From mono to stereo to surround-a guide to microphone design and application. CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gary W Elko and Kieran P Harney. 2009. A History of Consumer Microphones: The Electret Condenser Microphone Meets Micro-Electro-Mechanical-Systems. Acoustics Today 5, 2 (2009), 4--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Tiago H Falk, Chenxi Zheng, and Wai-Yip Chan. 2010. A non-intrusive quality and intelligibility measure of reverberant and dereverberated speech. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 18, 7 (2010), 1766--1774.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Xing Fan, Jun Chen, Jin Yang, Peng Bai, Zhaoling Li, and Zhong Lin Wang. 2015. Ultrathin, rollable, paper-based triboelectric nanogenerator for acoustic energy harvesting and self-powered sound recording. ACS nano 9, 4 (2015), 4236--4243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Freeman W Fraim, Preston V Murphy, and Robert J Ferran. 1973. Electrets in miniature microphones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 53, 6 (1973), 1601--1608.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J Frieden. 2005. Modern sensors. Handbook. Moscow, Technosphere (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Suma George, Sihwan Kim, Sahil Shah, Jennifer Hasler, Michelle Collins, Farhan Adil, Richard Wunderlich, Stephen Nease, and Shubha Ramakrishnan. 2016. A programmable and configurable mixed-mode FPAA SoC. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems 24, 6 (2016), 2253--2261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Nad Gilbert, Yanqing Zhang, John Dinh, Benton Calhoun, and Shane Hollmer. 2013. A 0.6 V 8 pJ/write non-volatile CBRAM macro embedded in a body sensor node for ultra low energy applications. In VLSI Circuits (VLSIC), 2013 Symposium on. IEEE, C204--C205.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Victor Giurgiutiu. 2007. Structural health monitoring: with piezoelectric wafer active sensors. Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ebenezer Hailemariam, Rhys Goldstein, Ramtin Attar, and Azam Khan. 2011. Real-time occupancy detection using decision trees with multiple sensor types. In Proceedings of the 2011 Symposium on Simulation for Architecture and Urban Design. Society for Computer Simulation International, 141--148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Xu He, Yunlong Zi, Hua Yu, Steven L Zhang, Jie Wang, Wenbo Ding, Haiyang Zou, Wei Zhang, Canhui Lu, and Zhong Lin Wang. 2017. An ultrathin paper-based self-powered system for portable electronics and wireless human-machine interaction. Nano Energy 39 (2017), 328--336.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Invensense. 2014. Invensense INMP441. https://www.invensense.com/products/digital/inmp441/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Mustafa Emre Karagozler, Ivan Poupyrev, Gary K Fedder, and Yuri Suzuki. 2013. Paper generators: harvesting energy from touching, rubbing and sliding. In Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 23--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Yoshihiro Kawahara, Steve Hodges, Benjamin S Cook, Cheng Zhang, and Gregory D Abowd. 2013. Instant inkjet circuits: lab-based inkjet printing to support rapid prototyping of UbiComp devices. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing. ACM, 363--372. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Mehdi R Khorrami, Ehab Fares, and Damiano Casalino. 2014. Towards full aircraft airframe noise prediction: lattice Boltzmann simulations. In 20th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference. 2481.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sunkook Kim, Hyuk-Jun Kwon, Sunghun Lee, Hongshik Shim, Youngtea Chun, Woong Choi, Jinho Kwack, Dongwon Han, MyoungSeop Song, Sungchul Kim, et al. 2011. Low Power Flexible Organic Light-Emitting Diode Display Device. Advanced Materials 23, 31 (2011), 3511--3516.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Soo-Jin Kim and Jang-Sik Lee. 2010. Flexible organic transistor memory devices. Nano letters 10, 8 (2010), 2884--2890.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sang Choon Ko, Yong Chul Kim, Seung Seob Lee, Seung Ho Choi, and Sang Ryong Kim. 2003. Micromachined piezoelectric membrane acoustic device. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 103, 1 (2003), 130--134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Timilehin Labeodan, Wim Zeiler, Gert Boxem, and Yang Zhao. 2015. Occupancy measurement in commercial office buildings for demand-driven control applications: A survey and detection system evaluation. Energy and Buildings 93 (2015), 303--314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Oscar D Lara and Miguel A Labrador. 2013. A survey on human activity recognition using wearable sensors. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials 15, 3 (2013), 1192--1209.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Eric C Larson, Mayank Goel, Gaetano Boriello, Sonya Heltshe, Margaret Rosenfeld, and Shwetak N Patel. 2012. SpiroSmart: using a microphone to measure lung function on a mobile phone. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 280--289. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jerad Lewis. 2012. Understanding microphone sensitivity. Analog Dialogue 46, 2 (2012), 14--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Jerad Lewis and Brian Moss. 2013. MEMS Microphone: The Future for Hearing Aids. Analog Dialogue 47 (2013), 3--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Bo Li, Tara Sainath, Arun Narayanan, Joe Caroselli, Michiel Bacchiani, Ananya Misra, Izhak Shafran, Hasim Sak, Golan Pundak, Kean Chin, et al. 2017. Acoustic Modeling for Google Home. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Wei Li, David Torres, Ramón Díaz, Zhengjun Wang, Changsheng Wu, Chuan Wang, Zhong Lin Wang, and Nelson Sepúlveda. 2017. Nanogenerator-based dual-functional and self-powered thin patch loudspeaker or microphone for flexible electronics. Nature Communications 8 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Long Lin, Sihong Wang, Simiao Niu, Chang Liu, Yannan Xie, and Zhong Lin Wang. 2014. Noncontact free-rotating disk triboelectric nanogenerator as a sustainable energy harvester and self-powered mechanical sensor. ACS applied materials 8 interfaces 6, 4 (2014), 3031--3038.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Long Lin, Yannan Xie, Sihong Wang, Wenzhuo Wu, Simiao Niu, Xiaonan Wen, and Zhong Lin Wang. 2013. Triboelectric active sensor array for self-powered static and dynamic pressure detection and tactile imaging. ACS nano 7, 9 (2013), 8266--8274.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Ruiyuan Liu, Xiao Kuang, Jianan Deng, Yi-Cheng Wang, Aurelia C Wang, Wenbo Ding, Ying-Chih Lai, Jun Chen, Peihong Wang, Zhiqun Lin, et al. 2018. Shape Memory Polymers for Body Motion Energy Harvesting and Self-Powered Mechanosensing. Advanced Materials (2018), 1705195.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Vincent Liu, Aaron Parks, Vamsi Talla, Shyamnath Gollakota, David Wetherall, and Joshua R Smith. 2013. Ambient backscatter: wireless communication out of thin air. In ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 43. ACM, 39--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Gaurav Mathur, Peter Desnoyers, Paul Chukiu, Deepak Ganesan, and Prashant Shenoy. 2009. Ultra-low power data storage for sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN) 5, 4 (2009), 33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Vidyabhushan Mohan, Trevor Bunker, Laura Grupp, Sudhanva Gurumurthi, Mircea R Stan, and Steven Swanson. 2013. Modeling power consumption of nand flash memories using flashpower. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 32, 7 (2013), 1031--1044. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Kei Nakatsuma, Rhoma Takedomi, Takaaki Eguchi, Yasutaka Oshima, and Ippei Torigoe. 2015. Active bioacoustic measurement for human-to-human skin contact area detection. In SENSORS, 2015 IEEE. IEEE, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Arokia Nathan, Arman Ahnood, Matthew T Cole, Sungsik Lee, Yuji Suzuki, Pritesh Hiralal, Francesco Bonaccorso, Tawfique Hasan, Luis Garcia-Gancedo, Andriy Dyadyusha, et al. 2012. Flexible electronics: the next ubiquitous platform. Proc. IEEE 100, Special Centennial Issue (2012), 1486--1517.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Jun Nishimura and Tadahiro Kuroda. 2008. Eating habits monitoring using wireless wearable in-ear microphone. In Wireless Pervasive Computing, 2008. ISWPC 2008. 3rd International Symposium on. IEEE, 130--132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Simiao Niu, Sihong Wang, Long Lin, Ying Liu, Yu Sheng Zhou, Youfan Hu, and Zhong Lin Wang. 2013. Theoretical study of contact-mode triboelectric nanogenerators as an effective power source. Energy 8 Environmental Science 6, 12 (2013), 3576--3583.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Kenji Nomura, Hiromichi Ohta, Kazushige Ueda, Toshio Kamiya, Masahiro Hirano, and Hideo Hosono. 2003. Thin-film transistor fabricated in single-crystalline transparent oxide semiconductor. Science 300, 5623 (2003), 1269--1272.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Changhyun Pang, Chanseok Lee, and Kahp-Yang Suh. 2013. Recent advances in flexible sensors for wearable and implantable devices. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 130, 3 (2013), 1429--1441.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Joseph A. Paradiso. 1996. The interactive balloon: Sensing, actuation and behavior in a common object. IBM Systems Journal 35, 3.4 (1996), 473--487. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Shwetak N Patel and Gregory D Abowd. 2007. Blui: low-cost localized blowable user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 217--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Michael Pederson, Wouter Olthuis, and Piet Bergveld. 1998. High-performance condenser microphone with fully integrated CMOS amplifier and DC-DC voltage converter. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems 7, 4 (1998), 387--394.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Massoud Pedram and Jan M Rabaey. 2002. Power aware design methodologies. Springer Science 8 Business Media. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Arthur N Popper, Richard R Fay, and Arthur N Popper. 2005. Sound source localization. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Michael Price, James Glass, and Anantha P Chandrakasan. 2017. A Low-Power Speech Recognizer and Voice Activity Detector Using Deep Neural Networks. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Yi Qi and Michael C McAlpine. 2010. Nanotechnology-enabled flexible and biocompatible energy harvesting. Energy 8 Environmental Science 3, 9 (2010), 1275--1285.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. P Raikwal, V Neema, and A Verma. 2017. High speed 8T SRAM cell design with improved read stability at 180nm technology. In Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA), 2017 International conference of, Vol. 2. IEEE, 563--568.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Meital Segev-Bar and Hossam Haick. 2013. Flexible sensors based on nanoparticles. ACS nano 7, 10 (2013), 8366--8378.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Wan-Ho Seol, Yong Min Lee, and Jung-Ki Park. 2007. Enhancement of the mechanical properties of PVDF membranes by non-solvent aided morphology control. Journal of Power Sources 170, 1 (2007), 191--195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. GM Sessler and JE West. 1973. Electret transducers: a review. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 53, 6 (1973), 1589--1600.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Sahil Shah, Caitlin N Teague, Omer T Inan, and Jennifer Hasler. 2016. A proof-of-concept classifier for acoustic signals from the knee joint on a FPAA. In SENSORS, 2016 IEEE. IEEE, 1--3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Richard C Simpson and Simon P Levine. 2002. Voice control of a powered wheelchair. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 10, 2 (2002), 122--125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Sparkfun. 2000. Foil Electret microphone datasheet. https://cdn.sparkfun.com/datasheets/Sensors/Sound/CEM-C9745JAD462P2.54R.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Sparkfun. 2012. SparkFun MEMS Microphone Breakout - INMP401 (ADMP401). https://www.sparkfun.com/products/9868Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Thad Starner. 2001. The challenges of wearable computing: Part 1. Ieee Micro 21, 4 (2001), 44--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Vamsi Talla, Mehrdad Hessar, Bryce Kellogg, Ali Najafi, Joshua R Smith, and Shyamnath Gollakota. 2017. LoRa backscatter: Enabling the vision of ubiquitous connectivity. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3 (2017), 105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Vamsi Talla, Bryce Kellogg, Shyamnath Gollakota, and Joshua R Smith. 2017. Battery-Free Cellphone. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 2 (2017), 25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. J-M Valin, François Michaud, Jean Rouat, and Dominic Létourneau. 2003. Robust sound source localization using a microphone array on a mobile robot. In Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2003.(IROS 2003). Proceedings. 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, Vol. 2. IEEE, 1228--1233.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Tim Van Kasteren, Athanasios Noulas, Gwenn Englebienne, and Ben Kröse. 2008. Accurate activity recognition in a home setting. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing. ACM, 1--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Zhong Lin Wang. 2013. Triboelectric nanogenerators as new energy technology for self-powered systems and as active mechanical and chemical sensors. ACS nano 7, 11 (2013), 9533--9557.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhong Lin Wang. 2015. Triboelectric nanogenerators as new energy technology and self-powered sensors--Principles, problems and perspectives. Faraday discussions 176 (2015), 447--458.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhong Lin Wang. 2017. On Maxwell's displacement current for energy and sensors: the origin of nanogenerators. Materials Today 20, 2 (2017), 74--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Zhong Lin Wang, Jun Chen, and Long Lin. 2015. Progress in triboelectric nanogenerators as a new energy technology and self-powered sensors. Energy 8 Environmental Science 8, 8 (2015), 2250--2282.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhong Lin Wang and Jinhui Song. 2006. Piezoelectric nanogenerators based on zinc oxide nanowire arrays. Science 312, 5771 (2006), 242--246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhong Lin Wang and Aurelia Chi Wang. 2018. Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Self-Powered Flexible Electronics and Internet of Things. In Meeting Abstracts. The Electrochemical Society, 1533--1533.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Kajiro Watanabe, Yosuke Kurihara, Tetsuo Nakamura, and Hiroshi Tanaka. 2010. Design of a low-frequency microphone for mobile phones and its application to ubiquitous medical and healthcare monitoring. IEEE Sensors Journal 10, 5 (2010), 934--941.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. JW Weigold, TJ Brosnihan, J Bergeron, and X Zhang. 2006. A MEMS condenser microphone for consumer applications. In Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 2006. MEMS 2006 Istanbul. 19th IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 86--89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. William S Wong and Alberto Salleo. 2009. Flexible electronics: materials and applications. Vol. 11. Springer Science 8 Business Media. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Minyi Xu, Peihong Wang, Yi-Cheng Wang, Steven L Zhang, Aurelia Chi Wang, Chunli Zhang, Zhengjun Wang, Xinxiang Pan, and Zhong Lin Wang. 2018. A Soft and Robust Spring Based Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Harvesting Arbitrary Directional Vibration Energy and Self-Powered Vibration Sensing. Advanced Energy Materials 8, 9 (2018), 1702432.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Minyi Xu, Yi-Cheng Wang, Steven L Zhang, Wenbo Ding, Jia Cheng, Xu He, Peng Zhang, Zhengjun Wang, Xinxiang Pan, and Zhong Lin Wang. 2017. An aeroelastic flutter based triboelectric nanogenerator as a self-powered active wind speed sensor in harsh environment. Extreme Mechanics Letters 15 (2017), 122--129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Jin Yang, Jun Chen, Ying Liu, Weiqing Yang, Yuanjie Su, and Zhong Lin Wang. 2014. Triboelectrification-Based Organic Film Nanogenerator for Acoustic Energy Harvesting and Self-Powered Active Acoustic Sensing. ACS Nano 8, 3 (2014), 2649--2657.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Po-Kang Yang, Zong-Hong Lin, Ken C Pradel, Long Lin, Xiuhan Li, Xiaonan Wen, Jr-Hau He, and Zhong Lin Wang. 2015. paper-based origami triboelectric nanogenerators and self-powered pressure sensors. ACS nano 9, 1 (2015), 901--907.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Hulin Zhang, Ya Yang, Yuanjie Su, Jun Chen, Katherine Adams, Sangmin Lee, Chenguo Hu, and Zhong Lin Wang. 2014. Triboelectric nanogenerator for harvesting vibration energy in full space and as self-powered acceleration sensor. Advanced Functional Materials 24, 10 (2014), 1401--1407.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Steven L Zhang, Ying-Chih Lai, Xu He, Ruiyuan Liu, Yunlong Zi, and Zhong Lin Wang. 2017. Auxetic Foam-Based Contact-Mode Triboelectric Nanogenerator with Highly Sensitive Self-Powered Strain Sensing Capabilities to Monitor Human Body Movement. Advanced Functional Materials 27, 25 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Lisong Zhou, Alfred Wanga, Sheng-Chu Wu, Jie Sun, Sungkyu Park, and Thomas N Jackson. 2006. All-organic active matrix flexible display. Applied Physics Letters 88, 8 (2006), 083502.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. Yaniv Zigel, Dima Litvak, and Israel Gannot. 2009. A method for automatic fall detection of elderly people using floor vibrations and sound: Proof of concept on human mimicking doll falls. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 56, 12 (2009), 2858--2867.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. SATURN: A Thin and Flexible Self-powered Microphone Leveraging Triboelectric Nanogenerator

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
          Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 2, Issue 2
          June 2018
          741 pages
          EISSN:2474-9567
          DOI:10.1145/3236498
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 5 July 2018
          • Accepted: 1 April 2018
          • Revised: 1 February 2018
          • Received: 1 November 2017
          Published in imwut Volume 2, Issue 2

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader