Luiz Eduardo Camargo Outeiro Hernandes

Este artigo defende a ideia de que o Supremo Tribunal Federal poderá contribuir na implementação do standarddo direito à moradia adequada das Nações Unidas. O direito à moradia adequada não trata apenas da perspectiva física da habitação, ela envolve um mínimo existencial, devendo equacionar as necessidades do ser humano. O estado de coisas inconstitucional é um instrumento reconhecido pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal por meio do qual a Corte Constitucional declara uma realidade incompatível com a constituição. Por conseguinte, com a utilização desse instrumento, abriria a possibilidade de efetivação do direito à moradia adequada da ONU.

This research is based on the hypothesis that the Brazilian Supreme Court
might contribute to the development of multilevel constitutionalism in Latin America by promoting functional dialogues with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.

The paper aims to establish a democratic and participatory perspective on the conflict between human rights and constitutional law in the judicial adjudication of rights, catalyzed by populism in complex society. The purpose of this paper is to investigate how dialogic hearings, as a technique for participation, cooperation, and dialogue construction, function within the context of the Inter-American Multidimensional System for Human Rights Protection. The research analyzed the documents that record the full Constitutional Courts on case laws. I argue that the Constitutional Courts contribute to overcoming the conflict between human rights and constitutional law, catalyzed by populism, increasing the normative dialogue between the international human rights order and the domestic constitutional order, through dialogic techniques, such as dialogic hearings.

The paper proposes to investigate the backlash effect as a reaction to changes in the structural foundations of society. The research of the paper focuses on the effectiveness of human rights in promoting social change in a society where discrimination practices exist. The paper aims to analyze the reaction from state, municipal, and federal legislatures to the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court's decision. Qualitative analysis of the data collected from samples was the methodology developed in the research. I examined the documents that record the full Brazilian Federal Supreme Courts deliberations and legislative reactions, such as ADPF 132, ADI 4277, RE 597285, and the legislative reactions to Bill 6583/13, Bill 0994/19, and Bill 4125/21. The papers highlight scientific contribution is to demonstrate that the traditional notion of backlash effect is incomplete and hides the real goals of the social reaction against the judicial decision. Finally, I argue that the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court's decisions on historic constitutional cases, such as the LGBTQIA+ community's fundamental rights, and racial and indigenous quotas in public universities, were challenged by the structural backlash effect through Brazilian legislatures.

The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the need for a structural transformation of justice institutions in Brazil so that they can properly develop their functions. To this purpose, it will be studied how the dialogic approach can foster a new vision in the institutions of justice in Brazil and subsidize reforms in the structures of these institutions

O objetivo do trabalho é analisar a aplicação pelo Supremo Tribunal
Federal dos standards de proteção do Sistema Interamericano de Direito Humanos aplicáveis às circunstâncias decorrentes da pandemia da Covid-19 a partir do controle de convencionalidade, ou, mais precisamente, do exercício do “convencionalismo dialógico”.

The purpose of this paper is to study the structural agreement called the “term of technical cooperation” signed in august 2020 by the Prosecution Office, by the State Health Department, by the Special Department of Indigenous Health, by the Municipal Health Department of Aquidauana, Miranda and Sidrolândia, by the Western Military Command and by the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul. The case study is justified because the “term of technical cooperation” was characterized as a structural agreement, built through consensual and negotiated solutions to remedy the crisis health involving fundamental social rights. By means of the deductive method, a dogmatic and critical research is carried out. The research also carried out the analysis of content and documental data collected from samples. As a result of the case study, it is concluded that the scope of the functions of justice institutions in Brazil should reflect the culture, objectives and values that promote dialogue, participation and the purposes of the structural process, so that they can fulfill their functions in an adequate, timely, efficient and effective way in the implementation of jurisdiction in the course of the structural process, which has as an essential dimension of protection of
fundamental social rights.

Área do Direito: Civil; Processual Resumo: O objetivo da pesquisa é estudar o Projeto de Lei "Ada Pellegrini Grinover" e suas técnicas dialógicas. Justifica-se a pesquisa na medida em que as técnicas dialógicas contidas no Projeto de Lei "Ada Pellegrini Grinover" ensejam o fortalecimento da legitimidade da atuação judicial. Por meio do método dedutivo, é realizada uma pesquisa dogmática e crítica. Por fim, conclui-se que o Projeto de Lei "Ada Pellegrini Grinover" permite a criação das bases do processo estrutural como um microcosmo democrático no Brasil, na medida em que transforma o paradigma processual vigente e introduz o paradigma da intersubjetividade inerente às técnicas dialógicas.

ABSTRACT: The  propuse  of  this  paper  is  to  show  the  need  for  a  complex approach  in  dealingwith issues  of  Bioethics  and  Bioconstitution,  with  a  focus  on transdisciplinarit,  holistic  perspective  and  dialogue,  in  order  to  encompass  life  in all  its  forms  and  the  ecosystem, not  restricting  itself  to  biomedical  crises.  For  this purpose,  the  research  adopted  the  methodology  of  bibliographic  survey  by  consulting books,  law  reviews  and  journals  and  other  sources  of  the  same  species,  which  supported the  theoretical  aspects  of  the  proposed  theme,  and  without  missing  thepoint  the  critical analysis  of  thelaw doctrine.  Empirical  research  was  also  carried  out.  Lastly,  the  paper embraces the human rights approach

The paper analyzes the application of the agreement of no criminal
prosecution in the Tax Crimes based on the methodological approach of the dialogic-deliberative process in criminal proceedings. The Law n. 13.964/2019 introduced in art. 28-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the institute of the agreement of no criminal prosecution. It is a legal transaction between the Public Prosecutor's Office and the investigated, together with their defender, whose purpose is to extinguish the criminal prosecution. By means of the agreement of no criminal prosecution, the aim is to promote a dialogue between the procedural subjects, so
that the agreement is the result of this participatory debate. Despite the material and procedural difficulties analyzed in the paper, the offering of an agreement of no criminal prosecution for tax crimes is applicable. Consequently, through it, consensual criminal justice is established and a dialogic-deliberative approach to criminal prosecution is opened up.

The  paper  aims to  demonstrate  the  hypothesis  that  public  hearings  are instruments  of  participation,  cooperation  and  dialogue  construction  within  the scope of the inter-American multilevel system for the protection of human rights, whose transformative articulation is inherent to it. The methodology used in the research  was  the  analysis  of  content  and  documental  data  collected  from samples.  The results  achieved  with  the  investigation  to  demonstrate  the correctness of the hypothesis and make explicit that the public hearings promote the dialogue between the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, the Constitutional Courts, the state institutions and the social actors especially impacted by violations of fundamental rights at the  national  level,  and  orient  the  Constitutional  Courts  to  transform  into transformative courts.

RESUMO: A função transformadora Constitucional é essencial para as implementações dos mecanismos e ferramentas da justiça de transição, a fim de promover a construção da paz sustentável para as transformações das estruturas institucionais, políticas, econômicas e sociais no Brasil, após a transição de regimes. Nesse contexto, a interpretação constitucional assume uma missão importante na realização das funções da Constituição, seus valores e normas, além de proporcionar aplicabilidade prática das reformas para as transformações do Estado, das instituições e da sociedade.

ABSTRACT: The Constitucional transformative function is essential for the implementations of the mechanisms and tools of the transitional justice, in order to promote the construction of the sustainable peace for the transformations of the institutional, political, economic and social structures in Brazil, after the transition of regimes. In this context, constitutional interpretation assumes an important mission in realizing the Constitution functions, its values and its norms, as well as providing practical applicability of the reforms for the transformations of the State, institutions and society.

The  recognition  of  a  system  of  binding  rules  about  corporate responsibility to respect human rights, with particular reference to the right to a healthy environment, is capable of promoting more benefits  than  costs,  saving  lives,  converting  the  possibility  of sanction into a cost to the polluter and to put the human being again at the center of the deliberation.

Resumo
A efetivação da justiça de transição promove maiores benefícios para a sociedade quanto à proteção dos direitos humanos e quanto à consolidação da democracia, permitindo a superação da cultura de violência e medo, na medida em que são implementados de forma ampla os seus mecanismos em uma sociedade pós-conflito. Por essas razões, a efetivação da justiça de transição no Brasil nos dias atuais traz mais benefícios sociais, contribuindo para que graves violações de direitos humanos não mais se repitam.

Palavras-chaves: Justiça de Transição. Benefícios. Custos. Análise Econômica do Direito. Efetivação. Democracia. Brasil. Crime contra Humanidade.

Abstract

The implementation of the transitional justice promotes greater benefits for society regarding the protection of human rights and the consolidation of democracy, allowing the overcoming of the culture of violence and fear, to the extent that its mechanisms are widely implemented in a society postconflict. For these reasons, the implementation of the transitional justice in Brazil, nowadays, brings more social benefits, contributing that serious violations of human
rights not repeated.
Keywords: Transitional Justice. Benefits. Costs. Economic Analysis of Law. Effectiveness.
Democracy. Brazil. Crime against Humanity.

The purpose of this article is to emphasize the necessity to promote a dialogue between Courts on issues where there are apparent normative conflicts between norms of the international legal order and of the internal legal order. In this sense, the dialogue between Courts allows the overcoming of state voluntarism and the development of cooperation between international and national Courts, avoiding the hierarchy of international and state legal orders. By means of theoretical research and using the deductive method, it is concluded that there is a need for a dialogue between Courts in cases of apparent normative conflict between the norms of the international legal order and the internal juridical system, as in the case "Vladimir Herzog", aiming at to overcome it, in order to promote the effective implementation of the international decision.