Ryan McMahon vetoes controversial Onondaga County legislative maps

Charles Garland, a county legislator-elect who will take office in January, speaks to Onondaga County Executive Ryan McMahon (right) at the redistricting hearing on Nov, 19, 2021. Garland said the changes proposed for his South Side district in Syracuse constitute “racial gerrymandering.” (Katrina Tulloch)

Charles Garland, a county legislator-elect who will take office in January, speaks to Onondaga County Executive Ryan McMahon (right) at the redistricting hearing on Nov, 19, 2021. Garland said the changes proposed for his South Side district in Syracuse constitute “racial gerrymandering.” Katrina Tulloch | ktulloch@syracuse.com

Syracuse, N.Y. – Onondaga County Executive Ryan McMahon today vetoed the county legislature’s proposed new maps of legislative districts.

His written veto message cites the need to comply with a technicality of state law. But McMahon told legislators informally that he also wants them to address “legitimate concerns’' about elimination of the county’s only majority-Black district, a spokesman said. Critics have called the changes to District 16 “racial gerrymandering.”

McMahon’s veto message asks the legislature to decrease the deviation in population size between districts to bring the new maps into compliance with state law. Under legislation signed several weeks ago by Gov. Kathy Hochul, the difference in population between the largest district and the smallest cannot exceed 5% of the average district size.

The difference between District 15, the largest with 29,137 people, and District 12, with 26,734, is 8.6% of the mean district population of 28,030.

It’s not in McMahon’s veto message, but while legislators tinker with the maps the county executive wants them to redraw District 16 to address concerns about the dilution of African American votes, McMahon spokesman Justin Sayles said.

District 16, on the South Side of Syracuse, is 59% African American, making it the only majority Black district. But the proposed maps would have reduced the Black population to 37%.

That plan sparked outrage from many residents, including the district’s Legislator-elect, Charles Garland, who has promised to sue unless the map is changed. It was not immediately clear whether McMahon has asked the legislature to restore the district’s status as majority Black.

In response to the veto, county legislators can either revise the maps themselves or reconvene the six-member redistricting commission to make changes. The legislature is expected to take up the matter at its next meeting Dec. 7. Legislator Chris Ryan, D-Geddes, said he will seek an opinion from county lawyers as to whether the commission or the legislature should make the revisions.

State legislation signed Oct. 27 by Hochul added new requirements to the redistricting process, including the stipulation that district populations vary by 5% or less. The law was initially misinterpreted, Sayles said. Previously, districts were allowed to vary by 10%, he said.

The county impaneled a six-member reapportionment commission in October to revise the district maps based on 2020 Census data. Three weeks after their first meeting, the commission approved new maps and forwarded them to the legislature. The legislature approved the maps Nov. 12 by a 9-8 vote.

Do you have a news tip or a story idea? Contact reporter Tim Knauss of syracuse.com/The Post-Standard: email | Twitter | | 315-470-3023.

Read more:

Onondaga County district maps headed to court unless McMahon vetoes, lawmaker vows

Onondaga County Legislature approves boundaries for new districts

Democrats cry foul as Onondaga County GOP attempts to rush redistricting

In surprising turn, GOP leader calls current Onondaga County district boundaries a mistake

Six Onondaga County residents appointed to redistricting commission

Slow down Onondaga County redistricting for transparency’s sake (Editorial Board Opinion)

Onondaga County redistricting commission sends worrying signals (Your Letters)

If you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy.