Skip to main content
Log in

Engagement with Digital Weight Loss Intervention Components and Weight Outcomes

  • Published:
Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This secondary analysis sought to understand how engagement with individual intervention components relates to outcomes. Young adults were randomly assigned to (1) targeted, (2) tailored, or (3) contact control groups in which content was delivered via Facebook, text messaging, and feedback reports. Participants were given one point for each component with which they engaged per week, for a maximum of 78 possible points over 6 months. Tertiles of engagement were defined as follows: low engagement (0–51% engaged), moderate engagement (52–66% engaged), and high engagement (67–100% engaged). Of the 354 participants with 6-month weight measurement, overall engagement decreased 33.6% from weeks 1 to 26 and was related to weight loss (p < 0.01) with high-engaged participants losing 1.8 kg more than low-engaged participants (p < 0.01). For every 10% increase in month 1 Facebook engagement, participants lost 0.34 kg (p < 0.01), which may have been driven by the targeted group (0.41 kg, p = 0.03). For every 10% engagement increase in the feedback report over 6 months, participants lost 0.27 kg (p = 0.02), which may have been driven by the tailored group (0.45 kg, p < 0.01). Weight loss interventions should consider increasing media use and personalized feedback for greater efficacy.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT02342912.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

De-identified data from this study are not available in a public archive. Deidentified data that support the findings of this study will be made available (as allowable according to institutional IRB standards) 6 months following publication for 5 years to researchers submitting a specific request and data sharing agreement to the corresponding author.

Analytic Code Availability

Analytic code used to conduct the analyses presented are not available in a public archive. They may be available by emailing the corresponding author.

Materials Availability

Some of the materials used to conduct the study including intervention protocols, and examples of intervention content are available in (Napolitano et al., 2017).

References

  • Abolhassani, S., Irani, M. D., Sarrafzadegan, N., Rabiei, K., Shahrokhi, S., Pourmoghaddas, Z., Mohammadifard, N., Roohafza, H., Asgary, S., & Moattar, F. (2012). Barriers and facilitators of weight management in overweight and obese people: Qualitative findings of TABASSOM project. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 17(3), 205–210.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, S. D., Elci, O. U., Sereika, S. M., Music, E., Styn, M. A., Turk, M. W., & Burke, L. E. (2009). Adherence to a behavioral weight loss treatment program enhances weight loss and improvements in biomarkers. Patient Preference and Adherence, 3, 151–160. https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s5802

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, N. A. (2018). Young adult cancer: Influence of the obesity pandemic. Obesity, 26(4), 641–650.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Leading causes of death. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/leading-causes-of-death.htm

  • Collins, L. M., Murphy, S. A., & Strecher, V. (2007). The Multiple Optimization Strategy (MOST) and the Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART): New methods for more potent eHealth interventions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32(5), S112–S118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dennison, L., Morrison, L., Lloyd, S., Phillips, D., Stuart, B., Williams, S., Bradbury, K., Roderick, P., Murray, E., Michie, S., Little, P., & Yardley, L. (2014). Does brief telephone support improve engagement with a web-based weight management intervention? Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(3), e95. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3199

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Greaney, M. L., Less, F. D., White, A. A., Dayton, S. F., Riebe, D., Blissmer, B., Shoff, S., Walsh, J. R., & Greene, G. W. (2009). College students’ barriers and enablers for healthful weight management: A qualitative study. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 41(4), 281–286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hageman, P. A., Mroz, J. E., Yoerger, M. A., & Pullen, C. H. (2019). User engagement associated with web-intervention features to attain clinically meaningful weight loss and weight maintenance in rural women. Journal of Obesity, 7932750. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7932750

  • Hawkins, R. P., Kreuter, M., Resnicow, K., Fishbein, M., & Dijkstra, A. (2008). Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Health Education Research, 23(3), 454–466.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, F., & Wardle, J. (2011). The association between weight loss and engagement with a web-based food and exercise diary in a commercial weight loss programme: A retrospective analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8, 83. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-83

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Koroukian, S. M., Dong, W., & Berger, N. A. (2019). Changes in age distribution of obesity-associated cancers. JAMA Network Open, 2(8), e199261.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kreuter, M. W., & Wray, R. J. (2003). Tailored and targeted health communication: Strategies for enhancing information relevance. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27, S227–S232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kreuter, M. W., Strecher, V. J., & Glassman, B. (1999). One size does not fit all: The case for tailoring print materials. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21(4), 276–283.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krukowski, R. A., Tilford, J. M., Harvey-Berino, J., & West, D. S. (2011). Comparing behavioral weight loss modalities: Incremental cost-effectiveness of an internet-based versus an in-person condition. Obesity, 19(8), 1629–1635.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LaRose, J. G., Fava, J. L., Lanoye, A., & Caccavale, L. J. (2019). Early engagement is associated with better weight loss in emerging adults. American Journal of Health Behavior, 43(4), 795–801. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.43.4.12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lascar, N., Brown, J., Pattison, H., et al. (2018). Type 2 diabetes in adolescents and young adults. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinology., 6(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30186-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, P. H., Grambow, S., Intille, S., Gallis, J. A., Lazenka, T., Bosworth, H., Voils, C. L., Bennett, G. G., Batch, B., Allen, J., Corsino, L., Tyson, C., & Svetkey, L. (2018). The association between engagement and weight loss through personal coaching and cell phone interventions in young adults: Randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 6(10), e10471. https://doi.org/10.2196/10471

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lustria, M. L., Noar, S. M., Cortese, J., Stee, S. K. V., Glueckauf, R. L., & Lee, J. (2013). A meta-analysis of web-delivered tailored health behavior change interventions. Journal of Health Communication, 18(9), 1039–1069. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.768727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, B. H., Napolitano, M. A., King, A. C., et al. (2007). Telephone versus print delivery of an individualized motivationally tailored physical activity intervention: Project STRIDE. Health Psychology, 26(4), 401–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, P. J., Scott, H. A., Young, M. D., Plotnikoff, R. C., Collins, C. E., & Callister, R. (2014). Associations between program outcomes and adherence to social cognitive theory tasks: Process evaluation of the SHED-IT community weight loss trial for men. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 11, 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0089-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Napolitano, M. A., & Marcus, B. H. (2002). Targeting and tailoring physical activity information using print and information technologies. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 30(3), 122–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Napolitano, M. A., Whiteley, J. A., Papandonatos, G., et al. (2006). Outcomes from the Women’s Wellness Project: A community-focused physical activity trial for women. Preventive Medicine, 43, 447–453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Napolitano, M. A., Whiteley, J. A., Mavredes, M. N., Faro, J., DiPietro, L., Hayman, L. L., Neighbors, C. J., & Simmens, S. (2017). Using social media to deliver weight loss programming to young adults: Design and rationale for the Healthy Body Healthy U (HBHU) trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 60, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2017.06.007

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Napolitano, M. A., Whiteley, J. A., Mavredes, M., Tjaden, A. H., Simmens, S., Hayman, L. L., Faro, J., Winston, G., Malin, S., & DiPietro, L. (2021). Effect of tailoring on weight loss among young adults receiving digital interventions: An 18 month randomized controlled trial. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 11(4), 970–980. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibab017

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Noar, S. M., Benac, C. F., & Harris, M. S. (2007). Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 673–693.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noar, S. M., Harrington, N. G., & Aldrich, R. S. (2009). The role of message tailoring in the development of persuasive health communication messages. Annals of the International Communication Association, 33(1), 73–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Painter, S., Ahmed, R., Kushner, R., Hill, J., Lindquist, R., Brunning, S., & Margulies, A. (2018). Expert coaching in weight loss: Retrospective analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(3), e92. https://www.jmir.org/2018/3/e92

  • Power, J. M., Phelan, S., Hatley, K., Brannen, A., Muñoz-Christian, K., Legato, M., & Tate, D. F. (2019). Engagement and weight loss in a web and mobile program for low-income postpartum women: Fit Moms/Mamás Activas. Health Education & Behavior, 46(2_suppl), 114S-123S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198119873915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rimer, B. K., & Kreuter, M. W. (2006). Advancing tailored health communication: A persuasion and message effects perspective. Journal of Communication, 56(s1), S184–S201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00289.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spring, B., Pfammatter, A. F., Marchese, S. H., Stump, T., Pellegrini, C., McFadden, H. G., Hedeker, D., Siddique, J., Jordan, N., & Collins, L. M. (2020). A factorial experiment to optimize remotely delivered behavioral treatment for obesity: Results of the Opt-IN study. Obesity, 28, 1652–1662. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. (1999). The Diabetes Prevention Program, Design and methods for a clinical trial in the prevention of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 22(4), 623–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. (2002). The diabetes prevention program (DPP): Description of lifestyle intervention. Diabetes Care, 25(12), 2165–2171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wangberg, S. C., Bergmo, T. S., & Johnsen, J. A. (2008). Adherence in Internet-based interventions. Patient Preference and Adherence, 2, 57–65.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Research reported in this manuscript was supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01DK100916 to MA Napolitano. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the current study conceptualization and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Jessica A. Whiteley, Ashley H. Tjaden, Jamie Faro, Loretta DiPietro, and Melissa A. Napolitano. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Jessica A. Whiteley, Jamie Faro, and Melissa A. Napolitano, and all authors commented on subsequent versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa A. Napolitano.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Boards of The George Washington University (#121325) and the University of Massachusetts Boston (#2014046).

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Whiteley, J.A., Tjaden, A.H., Bailey, C.P. et al. Engagement with Digital Weight Loss Intervention Components and Weight Outcomes. J. technol. behav. sci. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-024-00388-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-024-00388-9

Keywords

Navigation