Amended
IN
Senate
January 11, 2024 |
Amended
IN
Senate
March 22, 2023 |
Introduced by Senator Caballero |
February 17, 2023 |
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment.
CEQA prohibits a public agency from approving or carrying out a project for which a certified EIR
has identified one or more significant effects on the environment that would occur if the project is approved or carried out unless the public agency finds either (1) changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment, (2) those changes or alterations are within the jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by the other agency, or (3) specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the EIR and the public agency finds that those specific considerations outweigh the significant effects on the environment, commonly known as a statement of overriding consideration.
This bill would provide that a public agency, in approving or carrying out a housing development project, as defined, a commercial project, or an industrial project, is not required
to issue a statement of overriding consideration for significant effects on the environment identified by a project’s vehicle miles traveled or similar metrics if the lead agency has imposed all feasible mitigation measures on the project and it finds no feasible alternatives to the project.
By imposing additional duties on the lead agency in determining the applicability of the provisions of the bill to a project, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(a)For purposes of this section, “project” means a housing development project, as defined in Section 65905.5 of the Government Code, a commercial project, or an industrial project.
(b)Notwithstanding Section 21081, with respect to significant effects on the environment identified by a project’s vehicle miles traveled analysis or similar metrics, a public agency, in approving or carrying out a project, is not required to comply with paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of, and subdivision (b) of, Section 21081 for those effects on the environment if both of the following are met:
(1)The lead agency has imposed all
feasible mitigation measures on the project for those effects.
(2)The lead agency finds no feasible alternative to the project.
(c)This section shall not be interpreted to affect the definition of “environment” set forth in Section 21060.5 or “significant effect on the environment” set forth in Section 21068.
No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.