|
Site improvements
Hi everyone, I just received the following message from groups.io. This upgrade will be happening on Thursday. Poat on the site if you see any problems. Thanks.
Web And App Improvements
We are
Hi everyone, I just received the following message from groups.io. This upgrade will be happening on Thursday. Poat on the site if you see any problems. Thanks.
Web And App Improvements
We are
|
By
Mark Karney
·
#31127
·
|
|
Re: Test carrier at 8270.03 Hz
Hello Paul,
I would also like to thank you for the report and for the spectrogram at 5170.03 Hz.
With corrected direction and some searching when selecting the rectangle for
the measurement, I even
Hello Paul,
I would also like to thank you for the report and for the spectrogram at 5170.03 Hz.
With corrected direction and some searching when selecting the rectangle for
the measurement, I even
|
By
DL3JMM
·
#31126
·
|
|
Re: NML's Frequency Offset
We both missed the hard coded '4'.
A more polished script would give a -oh option to
vtsidex and look for the column heading 'cp1' to know
which field holds the phase. I leave that as an
We both missed the hard coded '4'.
A more polished script would give a -oh option to
vtsidex and look for the column heading 'cp1' to know
which field holds the phase. I leave that as an
|
By
Paul
·
#31125
·
|
|
Re: NML's Frequency Offset
Hi Paul,
My apologies for missing this! This is just more motivation for getting the H field receiver prototyped and built.
It looks like this was successful! Here is the output:
./sidslope NML
Hi Paul,
My apologies for missing this! This is just more motivation for getting the H field receiver prototyped and built.
It looks like this was successful! Here is the output:
./sidslope NML
|
By
Jonathan
·
#31124
·
|
|
Re: Test carrier at 8270.03 Hz
I ran the 5170 Hz spectrogram, to get
http://abelian.org/fbins3.html#r=vlf1&f=5170&p=1713322800&b=090&s=sp&m=cardioid&w=r&h=62&z1=0.34&z2=0.64&c=1&mb=485,43,514,110,0
which is showing 60nV/m.
Once
I ran the 5170 Hz spectrogram, to get
http://abelian.org/fbins3.html#r=vlf1&f=5170&p=1713322800&b=090&s=sp&m=cardioid&w=r&h=62&z1=0.34&z2=0.64&c=1&mb=485,43,514,110,0
which is showing 60nV/m.
Once
|
By
Paul
·
#31123
·
|
|
Re: NML's Frequency Offset
Ah, I see why.
Look for the line:
if (sizeof( fields) < 4) continue; // Skip any empty lines
Change the 4 to a 2, that will help! I've got two more
amplitude channels. Also, change the
Ah, I see why.
Look for the line:
if (sizeof( fields) < 4) continue; // Skip any empty lines
Change the 4 to a 2, that will help! I've got two more
amplitude channels. Also, change the
|
By
Paul
·
#31122
·
|
|
Re: NML's Frequency Offset
Hi Paul,
I really appreciate this! On the Ubuntu 22.04 system I have vtsid running, I actually had to download and manually install Pike because there was no package available and I did an apt-get
Hi Paul,
I really appreciate this! On the Ubuntu 22.04 system I have vtsid running, I actually had to download and manually install Pike because there was no package available and I did an apt-get
|
By
Jonathan
·
#31121
·
|
|
Re: Test carrier at 8270.03 Hz
Hello Paul,
Thank you very much for your report about my broadcast on 8270.03 Hz on April 15, 2024.
There were a lot of thunderstorms that day, but I really wanted to test my Earth Loop after the
Hello Paul,
Thank you very much for your report about my broadcast on 8270.03 Hz on April 15, 2024.
There were a lot of thunderstorms that day, but I really wanted to test my Earth Loop after the
|
By
DL3JMM
·
#31120
·
|
|
Re: NML's Frequency Offset
I attach a little pike program to do the median slope thing.
Save it and make it executable with chmod +x.
We only need the slope, not the intercept, so no need to do
the full Theil-Sen.
Look for
I attach a little pike program to do the median slope thing.
Save it and make it executable with chmod +x.
We only need the slope, not the intercept, so no need to do
the full Theil-Sen.
Look for
|
By
Paul
·
#31119
·
|
|
Re: NML's Frequency Offset
Paul,
I was thinking that a linear regression would be the solution, especially in my case, but I absolutely see how it wouldn't work too well with weaker signals and a median slope fit would work
Paul,
I was thinking that a linear regression would be the solution, especially in my case, but I absolutely see how it wouldn't work too well with weaker signals and a median slope fit would work
|
By
Jonathan
·
#31118
·
|
|
Re: Test carrier at 5170.03 Hz
Today, April 16, 2024 from 09:00 UTC, I will finish transmitting the carrier at 5170.03 Hz.
Bernd
DL3JMM
JO60MR
Today, April 16, 2024 from 09:00 UTC, I will finish transmitting the carrier at 5170.03 Hz.
Bernd
DL3JMM
JO60MR
|
By
DL3JMM
·
#31117
·
|
|
Re: Test carrier at 8270.03 Hz
Bernd wrote:
Thanks. Received well in Todmorden as usual, about 60nV/m.
For comparison, in January 2023, your 300W carrier
(between EbNaut transmissions to North America) was measuring
about 270
Bernd wrote:
Thanks. Received well in Todmorden as usual, about 60nV/m.
For comparison, in January 2023, your 300W carrier
(between EbNaut transmissions to North America) was measuring
about 270
|
By
Paul
·
#31116
·
|
|
Test carrier at 5170.03 Hz
Today, April 16, 2024, starting at 05:45 UTC, I am transmitting a carrier at 5170.03 Hz.
The power is approx. 40W.
Bernd
DL3JMM
JO60MR
Today, April 16, 2024, starting at 05:45 UTC, I am transmitting a carrier at 5170.03 Hz.
The power is approx. 40W.
Bernd
DL3JMM
JO60MR
|
By
DL3JMM
·
#31115
·
|
|
Test carrier at 8270.03 Hz
With a lot of effort and sweat, I was able to repair the many damaged areas of my earth loop.
For a test, I've been sending a carrier on 8270.03 Hz since 15:00 UTC. I'll have it for a few hours
send
With a lot of effort and sweat, I was able to repair the many damaged areas of my earth loop.
For a test, I've been sending a carrier on 8270.03 Hz since 15:00 UTC. I'll have it for a few hours
send
|
By
DL3JMM
·
#31114
·
|
|
Re: NML's Frequency Offset
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 01:01 AM, Paul wrote:
A really nice general purpose language is one called Pike,
not well known but it's almost
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 01:01 AM, Paul wrote:
A really nice general purpose language is one called Pike,
not well known but it's almost
|
By
Graham
·
#31113
·
|
|
Re: vlfrx-tools quick question
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 10:53 PM, Jonathan wrote:
Most "True RMS" and other RMS-measuring volt meters seem to only have accuracy at low frequencies like power line frequencies, so the voltage value at
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 10:53 PM, Jonathan wrote:
Most "True RMS" and other RMS-measuring volt meters seem to only have accuracy at low frequencies like power line frequencies, so the voltage value at
|
By
Graham
·
#31112
·
|
|
Re: NML's Frequency Offset
Picking the central 6 hours of daytime from the first day,
from 15:00 to 21:00 the phase goes from -253.78 to -1808.01.
Rounding a little, that's
-1554.23 degrees in 6 hours;
-1554.23/360 cycles
Picking the central 6 hours of daytime from the first day,
from 15:00 to 21:00 the phase goes from -253.78 to -1808.01.
Rounding a little, that's
-1554.23 degrees in 6 hours;
-1554.23/360 cycles
|
By
Paul
·
#31111
·
|
|
Re: vlfrx-tools quick question
Graham,
Most "True RMS" and other RMS-measuring volt meters seem to only have accuracy at low frequencies like power line frequencies, so the voltage value at audio frequencies may not be the most
Graham,
Most "True RMS" and other RMS-measuring volt meters seem to only have accuracy at low frequencies like power line frequencies, so the voltage value at audio frequencies may not be the most
|
By
Jonathan
·
#31110
·
|
|
Re: NML's Frequency Offset
Paul, Markus,
I appreciate this and it certainly is not as complicated as I thought. At vlf44's location in Spring Brook Township, PA, NAA's signal is quite strong. Here are plots from 4/4 and
Paul, Markus,
I appreciate this and it certainly is not as complicated as I thought. At vlf44's location in Spring Brook Township, PA, NAA's signal is quite strong. Here are plots from 4/4 and
|
By
Jonathan
·
#31109
·
|
|
Re: vlfrx-tools quick question
Paul and Jonathan,
Thank you for the replies.
I had noted:
I was doing some testing using vlfrx-tools and a USB sound card to test it's line/mic inputs and line out with the idea of using it to test
Paul and Jonathan,
Thank you for the replies.
I had noted:
I was doing some testing using vlfrx-tools and a USB sound card to test it's line/mic inputs and line out with the idea of using it to test
|
By
Graham
·
#31108
·
|