Survey results

Wilco

• The assumption is out of date. I left a comment about it here: Update rule to address assistive technology inconsistencies act-rules/act-rules.github.io#1384
• Implementations are missing.
• Issue 1367 There is pull request 1384 for it.

Trevor

• Editorial: The note under failed example 4 has two colons. Are we allowing notes inside of the examples, or should we find a different place for that as well. Need to determine how to handle the notes before publishing for consistency I think.
• Could the note in the applicability section moved under accessibility support as possibly unsupported by browsers?

Kathy

• https://act-rules.github.io/rules/cae760#inapplicable-example-3
  Inapplicable Example 3 - This iframe element has a negative tabindex and therefore is not included in the sequential focus navigation. <iframe tabindex="-1" src="/test-assets/SC4-1-2-frame-doc.html"> </iframe> Is this included in the accessibility tree? If so, it should not be inapplicable. Clarify inapplicable example 3
• There's recent emails about iframes need a title from the AG WG that discusses the need for this rule.
• Issues 1367 and 1170.