Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Email: Intopia Feedback - WCAG 3.0 FPWD (5 - Processes) #470

Open
jspellman opened this issue Mar 12, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Email: Intopia Feedback - WCAG 3.0 FPWD (5 - Processes) #470

jspellman opened this issue Mar 12, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@jspellman
Copy link
Contributor

Comment from Email:

FPWD: Is this approach of using complete processes as the smallest unit of conformance workable for different types of organizations? These include organizations with very large, dynamic, or complex content, medium-sized organizations relying on external accessibility resources, and very small organizations with limited resources?

We believe that the approach can be workable across different types of organisations, as it allows them to focus on making core tasks accessible rather than individual pages, something that should be achievable regardless of organisation size.

Some additional clarity on the definition of a process is required. Processes can be complex (including across multiple pages of a website or views of an application).

Example: For a consumer merchant website that has an ‘Add to Cart’ and ‘Checkout’ step, would this be considered a single process or a number of processes? Depending on interpretation, only part of these steps could be accessible, but the organisation may still be eligible for Bronze status.

@jspellman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for your comment. Project members are working on your comment. You may see discussion in the comment thread and we may ask for additional information as we work on it. We will mark the official response when we are finished and close the issue.

@jspellman jspellman added the status: comment - no change comment or suggestion - no action required label Mar 16, 2021
@jspellman jspellman added this to To do in FPWD: Scoring Mar 19, 2021
@mbgower mbgower self-assigned this Dec 15, 2021
@rachaelbradley rachaelbradley removed status: comment - no change comment or suggestion - no action required status: assigned to subgroup ask subgroup for proposal section: testing section: scoring Subgroup: editors no specific subgroup (default) labels Jan 20, 2022
@rachaelbradley rachaelbradley added this to the Foundation: Scoping milestone Jan 20, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
No open projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants