Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feedback on Text Alternatives #386

Open
SDStephens opened this issue Feb 26, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Feedback on Text Alternatives #386

SDStephens opened this issue Feb 26, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@SDStephens
Copy link

I do think that organizations will stop at the 95% mark. Call me cynical, but I think that’s true. I am not a technically skilled person in this area—is there a way to weight the views used most often in processes so that those have to be 100% compliant, but a few images in the periphery—used only in one, non-common process or something like that—could be missed without failing? I see that is somewhat addressed in the conformance section at the end, but isn't addressed here in the midst of the testing section.

@jpascalides jpascalides added action: editor triage issues that need leadership to triage section: testing labels Mar 5, 2021
@jspellman
Copy link
Contributor

This is an interesting idea. Some members have expressed that it is easier to count exceptions rather than count all the things that comply. This possibly could apply to identifying the less important items rather than identifying all the important items. I would like to see the group working on defining processes, tasks, and critical errors look at this idea.

@rachaelbradley rachaelbradley added this to the Foundation: Scoping milestone Jan 18, 2022
@rachaelbradley rachaelbradley removed action: editor triage issues that need leadership to triage section: testing labels Jan 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants