Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tradeoffs question #352

Open
paulairy opened this issue Feb 26, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Tradeoffs question #352

paulairy opened this issue Feb 26, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
migration: core Issues that raise core questions that are still open for discussion status: assigned to subgroup ask subgroup for proposal Subgroup: editors no specific subgroup (default)

Comments

@paulairy
Copy link

What do you see as the possible tradeoffs in using a flexible conformance approach? Would you want to see multiple conformance models?

  • The tradeoffs are that you’ll have some loss of quality in areas. I wouldn’t want multiple conformance models. I would encourage simplicity.
@lauracarlson lauracarlson added status: assigned to subgroup ask subgroup for proposal Subgroup: editors no specific subgroup (default) labels Mar 3, 2021
@lauracarlson
Copy link

Thank you for your comment. Project members are working on your comment. You may see discussion in the comment thread and we may ask for additional information as we work on it. We will mark the official response when we are finished and close the issue.

@rachaelbradley rachaelbradley added the migration: core Issues that raise core questions that are still open for discussion label Aug 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
migration: core Issues that raise core questions that are still open for discussion status: assigned to subgroup ask subgroup for proposal Subgroup: editors no specific subgroup (default)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants