Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

A replicable strategy for mapping air pollution’s community-level health impacts and catalyzing prevention

Environmental Health volume 21, Article number: 70 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Air pollution was responsible for an estimated 6.7 million deaths globally in 2019 and 197,000 deaths in the United States. Fossil fuel combustion is the major source.

Hypothesis

Mapping air pollution’s health impacts at the community level using publicly available data and open-source software will provide a replicable strategy for catalyzing pollution prevention.

Methods

Using EPA’s Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis (BenMAP-CE) software and state data, we quantified the effects of airborne fine particulate matter (PM2.5) pollution on disease, death and children’s cognitive function (IQ Loss) in each city and town in Massachusetts. To develop a first-order estimate of PM2.5 pollution’s impact on child IQ, we derived a concentration-response coefficient through literature review.

Findings

The annual mean PM2.5 concentration in Massachusetts in 2019 was 6.3 μg/M3, a level below EPA’s standard of 12 μg/M3 and above WHO’s guideline of 5 μg/M3. In adults, PM2.5 pollution was responsible for an estimated 2780 (Confidence Interval [CI] 2726 – 2853) deaths: 1677 (CI, 1346 – 1926) from cardiovascular disease, 2185 (CI, 941–3409) from lung cancer, 200 (CI, 66–316) from stroke, and 343 (CI, 222–458) from chronic respiratory disease. In children, PM2.5 pollution was responsible for 308 (CI, 105–471) low-weight births, 15,386 (CJ, 5433-23,483) asthma cases, and a provisionally estimated loss of nearly 2 million Performance IQ points; IQ loss impairs children’s school performance, reduces graduation rates and decreases lifetime earnings. Air-pollution-related disease, death and IQ loss were most severe in low-income, minority communities, but occurred in every city and town in Massachusetts regardless of location, demographics or median family income.

Conclusion

Disease, death and IQ loss occur at air pollution exposure levels below current EPA standards. Prevention of disease and premature death and preservation of children’s cognitive function will require that EPA air quality standards be tightened. Enduring prevention will require government-incentivized transition to renewable energy coupled with phase-outs of subsidies and tax breaks for fossil fuels. Highly localized information on air pollution’s impacts on health and on children’s cognitive function has potential to catalyze pollution prevention.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Air pollution – unwanted material released to the atmosphere by human activity - is the world’s largest environmental cause of disease, disability and premature death [1]. Air pollution was responsible for an estimated 6.7 million (CI, 5.9–7.5 million) deaths globally in 2019, with the overwhelming majority in low-income and middle-income countries. In the United States, air pollution is responsible for an estimated 197,000 deaths annually (95% CI, 183,000 – 214,000) [2]. Fossil fuel combustion is the predominant anthropogenic source of ambient air pollution. It is responsible for 85% of all airborne particulate pollution and virtually all pollution by oxides of nitrogen (NOX) and sulfur (SOX) [3].

Airborne fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air pollution is linked to multiple non-communicable diseases [4]. In adults, these include cardiovascular disease, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, lung cancer and diabetes [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. In infants and children, air pollution increases risk for premature birth [12,13,14], low birthweight [12,13,14], stillbirth [12,13,14], asthma [15,16,17,18,19], and impaired lung development [18,19,20]. Prematurity and low birth weight are risk factors for cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, hypertension and diabetes in adult life [21]. Impaired lung growth increases risk for chronic respiratory disease [20].

Emerging evidence indicates that air pollution is associated with neurologic dysfunction in both adults and children [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. In adults, associations are reported between PM2.5 pollution and risk of dementia [22,23,24,25,26,27]. In children, exposures to PM2.5 and other components of air pollution are linked to loss of cognitive function (IQ loss), memory deficits, behavioral dysfunction, reductions in brain volume and increased risks of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39].

All of these adverse health effects occur at PM2.5 exposure levels below the US Environmental Protection Agency’s current annual mean standard of 12.0 μg/m3 [5, 40, 41]. Recognizing that PM2.5 pollution causes adverse health effects at levels previously thought to be safe, the World Health Organization recently lowered their recommended PM2.5 guideline from 10 μg/m3 to 5 μg/m3 [4].

Air pollution and its health effects are not equitably distributed. Multiple studies document that poor, minority and marginalized communities bear a disproportionately heavy burden of air pollution exposure and pollution-related disease [42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. In the COVID-19 pandemic, minority communities exposed to high levels of particulate pollution experienced disproportionately increased rates of hospitalization and death [49].

Air pollutant emissions have decreased by 74% In the United States since passage of the Clean Air Act in 1970 [50]. Air pollution control has proven highly cost-effective, yielding an estimated return of $30 for every dollar invested [51]. The consequences have been improved health, reduced pollution-related disease and death and increased longevity [6]. A particularly noteworthy triumph was control of airborne lead pollution by the removal of lead from gasoline. This intervention resulted in a more than 95% reduction in mean blood lead levels in American children and in an estimated 5-point gain in the average IQ of every child born in the United States since 1980 [52].

A challenge to the continuing control of air pollution in the aftermath of these gains is that pollutant levels in high-income countries are much lower today than in the past and pollution’s health impacts may not be immediately visible. In this circumstance there is danger that pollution will be regarded as a solved problem and that progress against pollution will stall.

A strategy for overcoming such complacency is to use newly developed open-source software and publicly available data to quantify air pollution’s health impacts at a local community level [53,54,55]. Findings from such localized mapping can be brought to the attention of the public and policy makers. This information has potential to increase awareness of the immediacy of pollution’s continuing health threats and thus to mobilize citizen action and catalyze pollution prevention.

In this report, we describe a study that uses publicly available data and open-source software to estimate the impacts of ambient PM2.5 air pollution on disease, death and children’s cognitive impairment (IQ loss) at the local level in each city and town across Massachusetts. This highly granular approach can be replicated in other areas of the United States.

Methods

Air pollution levels

To estimate fine airborne particulate matter (PM2.5) pollution exposures in Massachusetts, we used 2019 data from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection’s (DEP) Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Network - a web of 22 air quality-monitoring stations dispersed across the state. When air pollution data were available within a city or town, we used these data to estimate air pollution exposures in the town. When town-specific data were not available, we applied data for the surrounding county. In the case of towns for which no county-level data available were available, we applied data from the nearest adjacent county. Thus, for four of the 14 counties - Norfolk, Barnstable, Dukes, and Nantucket – no monitoring data were available. Therefore, for these counties, we used the values in contiguous counties to estimate pollution levels. For instance, Norfolk County shares borders with Bristol, Worcester, Middlesex, Suffolk, and Plymouth counties. The mean PM2.5 concentration in these five counties, 6.79 μg/m3, was used to estimate exposure in Norfolk County. Barnstable County shares a border with Plymouth County, and the PM2.5 concentration for Plymouth County was applied to Barnstable County. Dukes and Nantucket Counties are both islands, and the value for the closest mainland county, Plymouth County, was therefore assumed for these counties.

Demographic and health data

We obtained demographic data on the size and structure of the population of each city and town in Massachusetts in 2019 from the US Census Bureau. We obtained data on incidence and mortality of heart disease, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and diabetes as well as data on pediatric asthma in each city and town from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health’s Population Health Information Tool [56]. We obtained data on incidence and mortality of lung and bronchial cancer from the Massachusetts Cancer registry [57]. We obtained data on the numbers of low birthweight babies and premature births in each city and town in Massachusetts from the Annie E. Casey Foundation’s Kids Count Data Center [58].

The burden of disease attributable to air pollution

We estimated the burden of disease and death attributable to air pollution in each city and town in Massachusetts using the US Environmental Protection Agency’s open-source Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program (BenMap-CE) [59]. BenMap-CE is software that contains data on air pollution levels, demographic data, and a range of concentration-response coefficients derived from epidemiologic studies quantifying relationships between air pollution exposure levels and adverse health effects (Table 1). These concentration-response coefficients specify the health impacts associated with each 1μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 concentration [59, 63]. In our analyses, we set a counterfactual PM2.5 exposure level 0 μg/m3. BenMap-CE supports the development of estimates of the burden of disease attributable to air pollution and the creation of maps showing air pollution concentrations and pollution-related health effects at the community level.

Table 1 Concentration-response coefficients for disease outcomes associated with PM2.5 exposure
Full size table

To examine the relationship between PM2.5 pollution level and death from all causes (all-cause mortality), we used the concentration-response function from Di et al. [41] To examine relationships between PM2.5 pollution and specific disease outcomes, we used the concentration-response functions indicated in Table 1.

Air pollution and IQ loss in children

Information on the relationship between PM2.5 air pollution and brain development in children is still emerging [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. A concentration-response coefficient based on a meta-analysis correlating PM2.5 concentrations to IQ loss has not yet been described in the literature nor is such a coefficient is included in EPA’s BenMap-CE software. Therefore, to derive a provisional concentration-response coefficient that could provide a first-order estimate of the relationship between airborne PM2.5 air pollution levels and cognitive loss in Massachusetts children, we conducted a review of the world’s literature to identify reports that had examined relationships between air pollution and loss of neurocognitive function, including IQ loss in infants and children.

We sought articles in all languages examining relationships between air pollution and IQ loss. The databases included were PubMed, Scopus and Embase. Our search string included the terms: “air pollution”, “fine particulate matter”, “PM2.5”, “ozone”, “nitrogen dioxide”, “black carbon”, “polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon”, “PAH”, “second-hand smoke”, “household air pollution”, “cognitive function”, “intelligence”.” IQ” “autism”, “ADHD”, “neurodevelopment”, “neurotoxicity”, “infant”, “child”, “adolescent” and “prenatal”.

We screened search results by title and then by abstract to identify relevant articles that met our inclusion criteria. We excluded nonhuman studies, non-original studies, reviews, and studies that did not quantify associations between PM2.5 air pollution and cognitive endpoints. We excluded articles examining environmental exposures other than air pollution. We used data extracted from this review to develop a provisional concentration-response coefficient quantifying the IQ loss in children that is associated with each unit increase in PM2.5 pollution.

Our literature review identified 1169 published articles that could potentially support development of an exposure-response coefficient. After removing duplicates, we identified 770 unique studies that met our screening criteria. We eliminated 671 of these studies through reviewing abstracts and determining that they did not meet our inclusion criteria. We eliminated another 72 studies that were not relevant to our investigation. At the conclusion of our review, we were left with 27 original studies that had quantitatively examined relationships between air pollution and neurocognitive impairment in children.

Three of these studies (Harris et al., 2015 [37]; Porta et al., 2016 [38]; Wang et al., 2017 [39]) most closely met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. They each found negative associations between PM2.5 pollution concentrations in prenatal and/or early postnatal life and IQ loss in children, and the association achieved statistical significance in the report by Wang et al. While both Verbal and Performance IQ were negatively affected by air pollution, strongest associations were consistently seen in all three studies between PM2.5 pollution levels and loss of Performance IQ (PIQ). Additionally, the study by Wang et al. reported effect modification by socio-economic status, with the inverse association between PM2.5 and Performance IQ stronger among less advantaged children [39].

We took the estimates of Performance IQ (PIQ) loss associated with each 1 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 concentration in the three studies that met our inclusion criteria and weighted them by sample size. This calculation produced a provisional estimate of 0.41 PIQ points lost in children for each 1 μg/M3 increase in the ambient PM2.5 concentration (Table 2).

Table 2 Development of a provisional concentration-response coefficient relating PM2.5 air pollution concentration (μg/m3) with Performance IQ (PIQ) loss in children
Full size table

To develop a provisional, first-order estimate of the PIQ loss caused by PM2.5 air pollution in children 0–9 years of age, we applied this concentration-response coefficient to air pollution and demographic data for each city and town in Massachusetts. We assumed that the concentration-response coefficient was linear in form and that it extended down to a PM2.5 pollution level of zero. This estimate can be reconsidered in the future when a published concentration-response coefficient based on a meta-analysis becomes available.

Results

Air pollution levels in Massachusetts

The annual mean concentration of PM2.5 pollution in Massachusetts in 2019 was 6.3 μg/M3. This concentration is below the US Environmental Protection Agency’s annual mean PM2.5 standard of 12 μg/M3 [40], but above the World Health Organization’s recommended guideline of 5 μg/M3 [4]. Air pollution levels by county are shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

PM2.5 Concentration by County, Massachusetts, 2019. Source: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Network

Full size image

Massachusetts sources released 938,201 tons of air pollutants in 2017, the most recent year for which data are available [64, 65]. Approximately 70% of these emissions (655,191 tons, including 3645 tons of PM2.5) were produced by mobile sources – cars, trucks, buses, trains, ships and planes – while the remaining 30% (283,010 tons, including 21,539 tons of PM2.5) were discharged by stationary sources including electricity-generating plants, other industrial facilities and buildings [64].

Virtually all of the air pollution produced in Massachusetts results from the combustion of fossil fuels. Massachusetts’ continuing heavy dependence on fossil fuels for power generation, heating and transport is sustained by multi-billion-dollar subsidies and tax breaks provided by state and federal governments to the fossil fuel industry [66].

Massachusetts demographics

The estimated population of Massachusetts on July 1, 2019 was 6,892,503 persons [67]. By gender, 51.5% of the population is female. By age, 5.2% of the population is under 5 years of age, 19.6% is under 18 years of age, and 17.0% is 65 years of age and above. By race, 80.6% of the Massachusetts population is White alone, 9.0% is Black or African-American alone, 0.5% is American Indian and Alaska Native alone, 7.2% is Asian alone, and 0.1% of is Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone. 2.6% of the population identifies as belonging to two or more races. 12.4% of the population identifies as Hispanic or Latino.

Deaths due to air pollution in Massachusetts

We estimate that air pollution was responsible for 2780 deaths in Massachusetts in 2019 (Confidence Interval [CI], 2726 – 2853), nearly 5% of the 58, 557 deaths in the state. Lung cancer was the largest cause of air-pollution-related death in Massachusetts in 2019, responsible for 2185 deaths (Confidence Interval [CI], 941–3409), followed by heart disease (1677 deaths, CI: 1346 – 1926), chronic lower respiratory disease (343 deaths, CI: 222–458) and stroke (200 deaths, CI: 66–316). We estimate additionally that the births of 308 babies of low birth weight (CI: 105–471) and 15,386 cases of pediatric asthma (CI, 5433 – 23,483) were attributable to air pollution (Table 3).

Table 3 Estimated adult deaths and pediatric disease cases attributable to PM2.5 air pollution by cause, Massachusetts, 2019
Full size table

Deaths due to air pollution in the cities and towns of Massachusetts

PM2.5 air pollution was responsible for premature deaths in every county, in every city and in all but the very smallest towns in Massachusetts in 2019 (Figs. 2 and 3 and Supplementary Tables 5 and 6).

Fig. 2
figure 2

All-Cause Mortality (Deaths per 1000) Attributable to PM2.5 Air Pollution by City and Town, Massachusetts, 2019

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Lung Cancer Deaths Attributable to PM2.5 Air Pollution by City and Town, Massachusetts, 2019

Full size image

PM2.5 Air Pollution and IQ Loss in Massachusetts Children. We estimate that early-life exposures to PM2.5 air pollution were associated with the loss of nearly 2 million Performance IQ points lost among children 0–9 years of age in Massachusetts in 2019, an average loss of more than 2 points per child. Information on IQ loss by city and town is presented in Supplementary Table 7.

Discussion

We found in this analysis that PM2.5 air pollution was responsible for an estimated 2780 (CI: 2726 – 2853) deaths in Massachusetts in 2019, nearly 5% of all deaths in the state. Of these deaths, an estimated 1677 were due to cardiovascular disease, 2185 to lung cancer, 200 to stroke, and 343 to chronic lower respiratory disease. Air pollution was responsible additionally for the birth of 308 low-birthweight babies (5.5 lbs. or less) and for 15,386 cases of pediatric asthma.

The annual mean concentration of PM2.5 air pollution in Massachusetts in 2019 was 6.3 μg/M3. Thus, the adverse health effects we estimated occurred at exposure levels below the US Environmental Protection Agency’s annual PM2.5 standard of 12 μg/M3 [40]. An extensive body of literature documents that PM2.5 pollution exposures at concentrations below 12 μg/M3 are associated with adverse health effects [4, 5, 41].

Open-source software enables quantification of air pollution’s health effects at a community level and supports mapping of localized health effects [53,54,55]. Using US EPA’s BenMAP-CE software [59], we documented that disease and death caused by air pollution occur in every community in Massachusetts. No community in the state is immune to air pollution’s impacts regardless of size, location, demographics, socioeconomic status or median family income. Air pollution does not respect political boundaries.

Air pollution’s health effects are not evenly distributed. Multiple studies have documented disproportionately high concentrations of pollution and disproportionately heavy burdens of pollution-related disease and death in economically disadvantaged and socially vulnerable communities [42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. This inequitable distribution of hazardous environmental exposures and polluti0on-related disease is an example of environmental injustice and a consequence of structural racism. It reflects long-standing inequities in the valuation of real estate (“red-lining”) and the deliberate siting of highways and polluting industrial facilities in low-income, predominantly minority communities [47, 48].

Prompted by new data documenting the negative effects of PM2.5 pollution exposure in early life on brain development [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39], we estimated air pollution’s impact on cognitive function in Massachusetts children. To support this analysis, we derived a provisional concentration-response coefficient linking PM2.5 concentrations to IQ loss through review of the published literature. Applying this coefficient to PM2.5 air pollution and demographic data for each city and town in Massachusetts, we estimated provisionally that air pollution is responsible for the loss of nearly 2 million Performance IQ points in Massachusetts children 0–9 years of age, an average loss of more than 2 Performance IQ points per child.

Robust cognitive function is essential for individual success and societal survival in today’s post-industrial, knowledge-driven world [68]. Cognitive function is a key predictor of earning potential, health and longevity as well as a core underpinning of the human capital of cities and countries [68, 69]. The Intelligence Quotient (IQ score) is the most widely used index of cognitive function [70]. IQ has the advantage that it is a highly standardized measure that has been used extensively in studies documenting the effects of toxic environmental exposures such as lead, mercury and pesticides on children’s brain development and cognitive function [71,72,73].

The IQ score measures both verbal and non-verbal cognitive abilities. Verbal IQ reflects vocabulary, knowledge, social reasoning and other “crystallized” cognitive abilities, whereas Performance IQ reflects non-verbal, more “fluid” abilities - the ability to reason and to solve novel problems. The cognitive functions assessed by Performance IQ are less dependent on culture, race and formalized learning than the “crystallized” functions evaluated on the Verbal scale. The IQ score also reflects other aspects of cognitive function such as memory, attention and problem-solving. Thus, if IQ loss is documented in children exposed to air pollution, memory, attention and problem-solving are also likely to be impaired.

Loss of cognitive functioning prevents individual children from attaining their full potential because IQ scores are highly correlated with academic performance, standardized test scores and high-school graduation rates [70, 71]. Population-wide IQ losses are also important, because reduction in the average IQ of all children in a population by as little as 2 points results in a significant decrease in the number of gifted children and a corresponding increase in the number with IQ scores below 70 [74, 75]. Any increase in the number of children with IQ scores below 70 is societally and economically significant because these children may experience a level of developmental delay that requires special education services and limits their capacity to live independently or to attain competitive employment.

Pollution-related IQ losses fall most heavily on children in Massachusetts’ most vulnerable communities, where they can magnify the impacts of poverty, racism, psychosocial stress and toxic environmental hazards such as lead [71]. The study by Wang et al. [39], one of the three studies on which we relied in developing the correlation between PM2.5 air pollution and Performance IQ loss, found that the inverse association between PM2.5 and Performance IQ was stronger among less advantaged children.

This analysis has several limitations. First, we were not able to map airborne PM2.5 pollution concentrations in Massachusetts as precisely as we might have wished because of the relatively small number of air pollution monitors operated by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP). This lack of geographically fine-grained information especially hindered our ability to quantify PM2.5 exposure levels in minority and low-income communities. Because such communities often comprise only a portion of a city or town’s total population, their pollution levels are typically aggregated with data from the remainder of the city or town unless monitors are placed there, and thus only an average concentration can be computed. Other investigators have developed fine-grained estimates of PM2.5 pollution based on EPA monitoring data coupled with satellite imagery [76]. In areas of the United States with few air monitoring stations such as the Great Plains and Rocky Mountain states these models provide important, previously unavailable information. In the northeastern United States, including Massachusetts, where monitors are more numerous (though still not sufficient in number), the difference between long-term average PM2.5 concentration as predicted by these models and the monitored long-term average concentration is small [76].

A second limitation on this study is the lack of a published, meta-analysis–based concentration-response coefficient linking PM2.5 air pollution concentrations to IQ loss in children. In the absence of a published coefficient, we were forced to derive a provisional coefficient through review of the published literature and to use this coefficient to estimate air-pollution-related IQ loss in Massachusetts children. We will update this provisional estimate when a meta-analysis–based concentration-response coefficient becomes available.

We would have liked to have examined in greater detail the possibility of an interaction between PM2.5 pollution and social disadvantage in their effects on children’s cognitive functioning. The report by Wang et al. [39] reported effect modification of the association between PM2.5 and Performance IQ by socio-economic status, with the inverse correlation being stronger among less advantaged children. However, the other two studies on which we relied (Harris et al., 2015 [37]; Porta et al., 2016 [38]) did not report analyses stratified by socio-economic status, and therefore we were not able to take this heterogeneity in risk into account in our analyses.

Disease and premature death caused by air pollution can be prevented. The 74% reduction in air pollutant emissions that has been achieved in the United States since passage of the Clean Air Act in 1970 and similar reductions seen in other countries demonstrate clearly that air pollution can be controlled by laws, regulations and technologies that are based on science, backed by enforcement and encouraged by incentives [1, 50,51,52]. Immediate control of air pollution and prevention of air-pollution-related disease in Massachusetts and across the United States will require tightening of EPA pollution control standards to at least bring them into line with World Health Organization guidelines. In Table 4, we present examples of actions that could be taken at the local and state levels in Massachusetts as well as nationally to control air pollution and prevent pollution-related disease.

Table 4 Examples of recommendations to reduce air pollution and prevent pollution-related disease
Full size table

Enduring control of air pollution will be most effectively achieved by a massive, wide-scale transition away from all fossil fuels to clean, renewable energy. Two very encouraging developments increase the likelihood that such a transition could occur within the next decade. The first is an almost 500% increase since 2010 in the fraction of electricity generated from wind and solar power, with the result that in 2021 investment in renewables surpassed all spending on oil and gas exploration for the first time [77]. The second development is steep reduction in the cost of producing electricity from renewables. The cost of generating electricity from solar energy has fallen by nearly 90% since 2010 and from wind by more than 50% [78]. These costs are projected to decline still further over the next five years as additional economies of scale are realized. It is now cheaper in many places to produce electricity from renewables than from any fossil fuel [79].

The impediments to air pollution control are no longer technical, but rather are economic and political. Key to control of air pollution and a rapid transition to clean, non-polluting energy will be courageous and visionary political leaders who heed the science, recognize pollution’s great dangers, and take bold, evidence-based action to stop pollution at its sources. Publication of community-level data on pollution’s health effects has potential to increase awareness of pollution’s dangers among policy-makers and the public and thus to catalyze preventive intervention [53,54,55].

Availability of data and materials

All materials can be made fully available.

References

  1. Landrigan PJ, Fuller R, Acosta NJ, Adeyi O, Arnold R, Baldé AB, et al. The lancet commission on pollution and health. Lancet. 2018;391(10119):462–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bowe B, Xie Y, Yan Y, Al-Aly Z. Burden of cause-specific mortality associated with PM2. 5 air pollution in the United States. JAMA Network Open. 2019;2(11):e1915834. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. International Energy Agency (IEA). World energy outlook 2016. Paris: IEA; 2016. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2016. Accessed 30 Jan 2022

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization. Ambient air pollution: pollutants: World Health Organization; 2021. https://wwwwhoint/airpollution/ambient/pollutants/en/ Accessed 30 Jan 2022

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dockery DW, Pope CA, Xu X, et al. An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1753–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199312093292401.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pope CA 3rd, Ezzati M, Dockery DW. Fine-particulate air pollution and life expectancy in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(4):376–86. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0805646.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1223–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2224–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Manisalidis I, Stavropoulou E, Stavropoulos A, Bezirtzoglou E. Environmental and health impacts of air pollution: a review. Front Public Health. 2020;8:14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Héroux ME, Anderson HR, Atkinson R, Brunekreef B, Cohen A, Forastiere F, et al. Quantifying the health impacts of ambient air pollutants: recommendations of a WHO/Europe project. Int J Public Health. 2015;60(5):619–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-015-0690-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Almetwally AA, Bin-Jumah M, Allam AA. Ambient air pollution and its influence on human health and welfare: an overview. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;27:24815–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09042-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bekkar B, Pacheco S, Basu R, DeNicola N. Association of air pollution and heat exposure with preterm birth, low birth weight, and stillbirth in the US: a systematic review. JAMA Open. 2020;3(6):e208243. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee PC, Roberts JM, Catov JM, Talbott EO, Ritz B. First trimester exposure to ambient air pollution, pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes in Allegheny County. PA Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(3):545–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1028-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun X, Luo X, Zhao C, Zhang B, Tao J, Yang Z, et al. The associations between birth weight and exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and its chemical constituents during pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Environ Pollut. 2016;211:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.12.022.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Khreis H, Kelly C, Tate J, Parslow R, Lucas K, Nieuwenhuijsen M. Exposure to traffic-related air pollution and risk of development of childhood asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Int. 2017;100:1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.11.012.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Breysse PN, Diette GB, Matsui EC, Butz AM, Hansel NN, McCormack MC. Indoor air pollution and asthma in children. Proc Amer Thoracic Society. 2010;7(2). https://doi.org/10.1513/pats.200908-083RM.

  17. Patel MM, Miller RL. Air pollution and childhood asthma: recent advances and future directions. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2009;21(2):235–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/mop.0b013e3283267726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mehta S, Shin H, Burnett R, North T, Cohen AJ. Ambient particulate air pollution and acute lower respiratory infections: a systematic review and implications for estimating the global burden of disease. Air Qual Atmos Health. 2011;6(1):69–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-011-0146-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldizen FC, Sly PD, Knibbs LD. Respiratory effects of air pollution on children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016;51:94–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.23262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gauderman WJ, Urman R, Avol E, Berhane K, McConnell R, Rappaport E, et al. Association of improved air quality with lung development in children. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(10):905–13. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1414123.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Heindel JJ, Balbus J, Birnbaum L, Brune-Drisse MN, Grandjean P, Gray K, et al. Developmental origins of health and disease: integrating environmental influences. Endocrinology. 2015;156(10):3416–21. https://doi.org/10.1210/EN.2015-1394.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Grandjean P, Landrigan PJ. Neurobehavioural effects of developmental toxicity. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(3):330–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70278-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Casanova R, Wang X, Reyes J, Akita Y, Serre ML, Vizuete W, et al. A voxel-based morphometry study reveals local brain structural alterations associated with ambient fine particles in older women. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:495. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dimakakou E, Johnston HJ, Streftaris G, Cherrie JW. Exposure to environmental and occupational particulate air pollution as a potential contributor to neurodegeneration and diabetes: a systematic review of epidemiological research. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(8):1704. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081704.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Heusinkveld HJ, Wahle T, Campbell A, Westerink RH, Tran L, Johnston H, et al. Neurodegenerative and neurological disorders by small inhaled particles. Neurotoxicology. 2016;56:94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2016.07.007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kioumourtzoglou MA, Schwartz JD, Weisskopf MG, Melly SJ, Wang Y, Dominici F, et al. Long-term PM2.5 exposure and neurological hospital admissions in the northeastern United States. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124(1):23–9. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sram RJ, Veleminsky M, Veleminsky M, Stejskalová J. The impact of air pollution to central nervous system in children and adults. Neuroendocrinol Lett. 2017;38(6):389–96.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Calderón-Garcidueñas L, Engle R, Mora-Tiscareño A, Styner M, Gómez-Garza G, Zhu H, et al. Exposure to severe urban air pollution influences cognitive outcomes, brain volume and systemic inflammation in clinically healthy children. Brain Cogn. 2011;77(3):345–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2008.04.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Donzelli G, Llopis-Gonzalez A, Llopis-Morales A, Cioni L, Morales-Suárez-Varela M. Particulate matter exposure and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;17(1):67. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010067.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sunyer J, Esnaola M, Alvarez-Pedrerol M, Forns J, Rivas I, López-Vicente M, et al. Association between traffic-related air pollution in schools and cognitive development in primary school children: a prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2015;12(3):e1001792. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001792.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Thygesen M, Holst GJ, Hansen B, Geels C, Kalkbrenner A, Schendel D, et al. Exposure to air pollution in early childhood and the association with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Environ Res. 2020;183:108930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108930.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Volk HE, Lurmann F, Penfold B, Hertz-Picciotto I, McConnell R. Traffic-related air pollution, particulate matter, and autism. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(1):71–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McGuinn LA, Windham GC, Kalkbrenner AE, Bradley C, Di Q, Croen LA, et al. Early life exposure to air pollution and autism spectrum disorder: findings from a multisite case-control study. Epidemiology. 2020;31(1):103–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chun H, Leung C, Wen SW, McDonald J, Shin HH. Maternal exposure to air pollution and risk of autism in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Pollut. 2020;256:113307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Volk HE, Perera F, Braun JM, Kingsley SL, Gray K, Buckley J, et al. Prenatal air pollution exposure and neurodevelopment: a review and blueprint for a harmonized approach within ECHO. Environ Res. 2020:110320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110320.

  36. Perera F, Ashrafi A, Kinney P, Mills D. Towards a fuller assessment of benefits to children's health of reducing air pollution and mitigating climate change due to fossil fuel combustion. Environ Res. 2019;172:55–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.016.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Harris MH, Gold DR, Rifas-Shiman SL, et al. Prenatal and childhood traffic-related pollution exposure and childhood cognition in the project viva cohort (Massachusetts, USA). Environ Health Perspect. 2015;123(10):1072–8. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408803.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Porta D, Narduzzi S, Badaloni C, Bucci S, Cesaroni G, Colelli V, et al. Air pollution and cognitive development at age 7 in a prospective Italian birth cohort. Epidemiology. 2016;27(2):228–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang P, Tuvblad C, Younan D, et al. Socioeconomic disparities and sexual dimorphism in neurotoxic effects of ambient fine particles on youth IQ: a longitudinal analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188731.

  40. US Environmental Protection Agency. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for PM. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/national-ambient-air-quality-standards-naaqs-pm. Accessed 5 Apr 2002.

  41. Di Q, Wang Y, Zanobetti A, Wang Y, Koutrakis P, Choirat C, et al. Air pollution and mortality in the Medicare population. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(26):2513–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1702747.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Bell ML, Ebisu K. Environmental inequality in exposures to airborne particulate matter components in the United States. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:1746–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Clark LP, Millet DB, Marshall JD. National patterns in environmental injustice and inequality: outdoor NO2 air pollution in the United States. PLoS One. 2014;9:8. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Miranda ML, Edwards SE, Keating MH, Paul CJ. Making the environmental justice grade: the relative burden of air pollution exposure in the United States. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8(6):1755–71. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8061755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Woo B, Kravitz-Wirtz N, Sass V, et al. Residential segregation and racial/ethnic disparities in ambient air pollution. Race Soc Probl. 2019;11:60–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-018-9254-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pinto de Moura M, Reichmuth D. Union of Concerned Scientists. In: Inequitable exposure to air pollution from vehicles in the northeast and mid-Atlantic; 2019. https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/inequitable-exposure-air-pollution-vehicles. Accessed 30 Jan 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bullard RD, Wright BH. Environmental justice for all: community perspectives on health and research needs. Toxicol Ind Health. 1993;9(5):821–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/074823379300900508.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Nardone A, Casey JA, Morello-Frosch R, Mujahid M, Balmes JR, Thakur N. Associations between historical residential redlining and current age-adjusted rates of emergency department visits due to asthma across eight cities in California: an ecological study. Lancet Planet Health. 2020;4(1):e24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30241-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Dey T, Dominici F. COVID-19, air pollution, and racial inequity: connecting the dots. Am J Sociol. 2020, 2010:15. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.0c00432.

  50. Samet JM, Burke TA, Goldstein BD. The trump administration and the environment — heed the science. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1182–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMms1615242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. US Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Air and Radiation. In: The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act from 1990 to 2020. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015. Accessed 1 June 2022.

  52. Grosse SD, Matte TD, Schwartz J, Jackson RJ. Economic gains resulting from the reduction in children’s exposure to lead in the United States. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110:563–9. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0211056307/documents/summaryreport.pdf (Accessed 13 Jan 2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Aronson RE, Wallis AB, O'Campo PJ, Schafer P. Neighborhood mapping and evaluation: a methodology for participatory community health initiatives. Matern Child Health J. 2007;11(4):373–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-007-0184-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Beck AF, Sandel MT, Ryan PH, Kahn RS. Mapping neighborhood health Geomarkers to clinical care decisions to promote equity in child health. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017;36(6):999–1005. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Kind AJH, Buckingham WR. Making neighborhood-disadvantage metrics accessible - the neighborhood atlas. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(26):2456–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1802313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Massachusetts Department of Public Health. The Population Health Information Tool (PHIT). https://www.mass.gov/orgs/population-health-information-tool. Accessed 1 Apr 2022.

  57. Massachusetts Department of Public Health. Massachusetts Cancer Registry. https://www.mass.gov/massachusetts-cancer-registry. Accessed 1 Apr 2022.

  58. Annie E. Casey Foundation. Low birth weight babies by city and town ("county subdivision") in Massachusetts. In: Kids Count Data Center. https://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/7239-low-birth-weight-babies-by-city-and-town-county-subdivision#detailed/11/3324-3674/false/870/any/14279,14280.Accessed 30 Jan 2022.

  59. US Environmental Protection Agency. 2019. Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program - Community Edition (BenMAP-CE). Available at: https://www.epa.gov/benmap. Accessed 27 Jan 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lin H, Guo Y, Di Q, Zheng Y, Kowal P, Xiao J, et al. Ambient PM2.5 and stroke: effect modifiers and population attributable risk in six low- and middle-income countries. Stroke. 2017;48(5):1191–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015739.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Lin H, Qian ZM, Guo Y, Zheng Y, Ai S, Hang J, et al. The attributable risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease due to ambient fine particulate pollution among older adults. Environ Int. 2018;113:143–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.01.029.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Krewski D, Jerrett M, Burnett R, et al. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society linking particulate air pollution and mortality. Cambridge: Health Effects Institute; 2009. https://www.healtheffects.org/publication/extended-follow-and-spatial-analysis-american-cancer-society-study-linking-particulate. Accessed 30 Jan 2022

    Google Scholar 

  63. Laden F, Schwartz J, Speizer FE, Dockery DW. Reduction in fine particulate air pollution and mortality: extended follow-up of the Harvard six cities study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173(6):667–72. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200503-443OC.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. US Environmental Protection Agency. National Emissions Inventory. Available at https://gispub.epa.gov/neireport/2017/. Accessed 23 Feb 2022.

  65. US Environmental Protection Agency (2021). Air Pollution Emissions Trends Data. United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/air-pollutant-emissions-trends-data. Accessed 30 Jan 2022.

  66. Landrigan PJ, Frumkin H, Lundberg BE. The false promise of natural gas. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(2):104–7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1913663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. United States census. Quick facts: Massachusetts. Accessed at: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/MA. Accessed 30 Jan 2022

  68. Case A, Paxson C. Height, health, and cognitive function at older ages. Am Econ Rev. 2008;98(2):463–7. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.2.463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Lim SS, Updike RL, Kaldjian AS, Barber R, Cowling K, York H, et al. Measuring human capital: a systematic analysis of 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016. Lancet. 2018;392:1217–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31941-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Neisser U, Boodoo G, Bouchard TJ Jr, Boykin AW, Brody N, Ceci SJ, et al. Intelligence: knowns and unknowns. Am Psychol. 1996;51(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Needleman HL, Gunnoe C, Leviton A, Reed R, Peresie H, Maher C, et al. Deficits in psychologic and classroom performance of children with elevated dentine lead levels. N Engl J Med. 1979;300(13):689–95. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197903293001301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Bellinger DC, Devleesschauwer B, O'Leary K, Gibb HJ. Global burden of intellectual disability resulting from prenatal exposure to methylmercury, 2015. Environ Res. 2019;170:416–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.042.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Bellinger DC. Applying methods of the global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors study to developmental neurotoxicants: a commentary. Environ Health. 2018;17:53–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0397-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Colborn T, Dumanoski D, Myers JP. Our stolen future: are we threatening our fertility, intelligence, and survival? New York: Penguin Books; 1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.3300160109.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  75. Gilbert SG, Weiss B. A rationale for lowering the blood lead action level from 10 to 2 microg/dL. Neurotoxicology. 2006;27(5):693–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2006.06.008.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Di Q, Kloog I, Koutrakis P, Lyapustin A, Wang Y, Schwartz J. Assessing PM2.5 exposures with high spatiotemporal resolution across the continental United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2016 May 3;50(9):4712–21. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b06121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Annual Report 2019. Environmental Market Opportunities: Clean Energy. http://goldmansachs.com/citizenship/environmental-stewardship/market-opportunities/clean-energy/. (Accessed 16 Jan 2022).

  78. UN Environment and Bloomberg NEF. Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2019. 2019. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/29752/GTR2019.pdf. (Accessed 16 Jan 2022).

  79. University of California at Berkeley. Goldman School of Public Policy. Plummeting Solar, Wind, And Battery Costs Can Accelerate Our Clean Electricity Future. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley; 2020. https://www.2035report.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/2035-Report.pdf. Accessed 16 Jan 2022.

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

The Barr Foundation, Boston USA - Grant Number: 20–08586.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Global Observatory on Pollution and Health, Boston College, Boston, MA, USA

    Philip J. Landrigan & Samantha Fisher

  2. Centre Scientifique de Monaco, Monaco, MC, Monaco

    Philip J. Landrigan

  3. Environmental; Epidemiology Program, City University of New York, New York, USA

    Samantha Fisher

  4. Lynch School of Education and Human Development, Boston College, Boston, MA, USA

    Maureen E. Kenny

  5. Morrissey College of Arts and Sciences, Boston College, Boston, MA, USA

    Brittney Gedeon, Luke Bryan & Jenna Mu

  6. Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA

    David Bellinger

Authors
  1. Philip J. Landrigan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Samantha Fisher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maureen E. Kenny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Brittney Gedeon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Luke Bryan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jenna Mu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. David Bellinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to writing and editing the manuscript. Philip Landrigan proposed the project and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Samantha Fisher led the analysis of data in the Ben Map Program. David Bellinger and Maureen Kenny provided expertise in interpreting the individual and societal significance of IQ scores in children. All authors have reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip J. Landrigan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

n/a

Consent for publication

All authors have reviewed the final manuscript and have consented to its publication.

Competing interests

None of the authors gave any competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Landrigan, P.J., Fisher, S., Kenny, M.E. et al. A replicable strategy for mapping air pollution’s community-level health impacts and catalyzing prevention. Environ Health 21, 70 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-022-00879-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-022-00879-3

Keywords

Environmental Health

ISSN: 1476-069X