Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Longitudinal Study of Gender Parity Trends of General Membership and Leadership in the Neurocritical Care Society between 2002 and 2019

  • Original work
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Several studies in critical care and neurology demonstrate women under-representation in professional societies; representation trends within the Neurocritical Care Society (NCS) are unknown. We examined longitudinal gender parity trends in membership and leadership within NCS.

Methods

A retrospective study of NCS membership and leadership rosters was conducted. To determine gender, self-reported binary gender was extracted. For individuals without recorded gender, a systematic Web-based search to identify usage of gender-specific pronouns in publicly available biographies was performed. According to previously published methods, available photographs were utilized to record presumed gender identification in the absence of available pronoun descriptors. We analyzed available data longitudinally from 2002 to 2019 and performed descriptive statistical and linear regression analyses.

Results

In overall membership, the proportion of women members demonstrated an average 11% increase between 2005 and 2018 (95% confidence interval (CI) − 8.1 to 30.1, p = 0.08). The proportion of women Board of Directors (BOD) members increased significantly over time to 50% in 2019. There was an increase in women Officers from 0% in the first 3 years (2002–2004) to 40% in 2019, with two women Presidents out of 17 from 2002 to 2019. For available Executive Committee rosters, there was a statistically significant nearly 3% increase per year (95% CI 1.5–4; p = 0.0007) in the proportion of women members. Rosters for Committee members and chairpersons were also incomplete, but in an analysis of the available data, there was a statistically significant increase of 5% per year analyzed (95% CI 0.5–9.7; p = 0.04) in the proportion of women Committee members. We also found a statistically significant 4.3% increase per year analyzed (95% CI 2.4–6.1; p = 0.003) in the proportion of women Committee chairpersons.

Conclusions

This is the first study of longitudinal gender parity trends within neurocritical care. We report that from 2002 to 2019, the NCS has undergone a significant increase in women representation in general membership, committee membership, and leadership positions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Elizabeth Blackwell. Changing the face of medicine 2015 June 3, 2015 [cited 2020 January 30, 2020]; Available from: https://cfmedicine.nlm.nih.gov/physicians/biography_35.html.

  2. Arif S, Khokhar S. A historical glance: Challenges for male nurses. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017;67(12):1889–944.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Draugalis JR, Plaza CM, Taylor DA, Meyer SM. The status of women in US academic pharmacy. Am J Pharm Educ. 2014;78(10):178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Turban S, Wu D, Zhang LT. When gender diversity makes firms more productive [Internet]. Harvard Business Review. 2019. Available from https://hbr.org/2019/02/research-when-gender-diversity-makes-firms-more-productive.

  5. Tsugawa Y, Jena AB, Figueroa JF, et al. Comparison of hospital mortality and readmission rates for medicare patients treated by male vs female physicians. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(2):206–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rahimy E, Jagsi R, Park HS, et al. Quality at the American society for radiation oncology annual meeting: gender balance among invited speakers and associations with panel success. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;104(5):987–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Silver JK. Understanding and addressing gender equity for women in neurology. Neurology. 2019;93(12):538–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mensah M, Beeler W, Rotenstein L, et al. Sex differences in salaries of department chairs at public medical schools. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(5):789–92. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.7540.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Venkatesh B, Mehta S, Angus DC, et al. Women in Intensive Care study: a preliminary assessment of international data on female representation in the ICU physician workforce, leadership and academic positions. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jagsi R, Means O, Lautenberger D, et al. Women's representation among members and leaders of national medical specialty societies. Acad Med. 2019;95:1043–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jagsi R, Guancial EA, Worobey CC, et al. The "gender gap" in authorship of academic medical literature—a 35-year perspective. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(3):281–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jagsi R, Tarbell NJ, Henault LE, Chang Y, Hylek EM. The representation of women on the editorial boards of major medical journals: a 35-year perspective. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(5):544–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Erren TC, Groß JV, Shaw DM, Selle B. Representation of women as authors, reviewers, editors in chief, and editorial board members at 6 general medical journals in 2010 and 2011. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(4):633–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Connolly S, Holdcroft A. The pay gap for women in medicine and academic medicine: an analysis of the WAM database. London. p: BMA; 2009. p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Silver JK. Gender equity on journal editorial boards. Lancet. 2019;393(10185):2037–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McDermott M, Gelb DJ, Wilson K, et al. Sex Differences in academic rank and publication rate at top-ranked US neurology programs. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(8):956–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mehta S, Burns KEA, Machado FR, et al. Gender parity in critical care medicine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(4):425–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lorello GR, Flexman AM. 75 years of leadership in the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society: a gender analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2019;66(7):843–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Flexman AM, Parmar A, Lorello GR. Representation of female authors in the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of articles between 1954 and 2017. Can J Anaesth. 2019;66(5):495–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Colleges AOAM. The majority of U.S. medical students are women, new data show. 2019 [cited 2020 March]; Available from: https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/press-releases/majority-us-medical-students-are-women-new-data-show.

  21. Matthews S. Registered male: a discussion on men in the nursing profession. Contem Nurse. 2001;11(2–3):231–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mackintosh C. A historical study of men in nursing. J Adv Nurs. 1997;26(2):232–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Greene T. Professional membership breakdown. Moheet A (ed) 2020.

  24. Society NC. Minutes. In: Board of directors meeting. 2019. Teleconference.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the NCS Leadership and Executive Office, particularly Ms. Sharon Allen, Tissy Greene and Dovile Svirupskaite for their support of this work, as well as the WINCC section and Dr. Diane Greene-Chandos for their support, and Dr. Jeffrey Singh for his thorough and critical review of the manuscript.

Funding

No grant support was received from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the conception, drafting, and critical revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asma M. Moheet.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

An Institutional Review Board waiver was granted by Rush University as the study did not meet the definition of human subjects research.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moheet, A.M., Mainali, S., McCredie, V.A. et al. A Longitudinal Study of Gender Parity Trends of General Membership and Leadership in the Neurocritical Care Society between 2002 and 2019. Neurocrit Care 35, 16–23 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-01124-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-01124-w

Keywords

Navigation