Abstract

Phylogenetic analyses based on morphological data support monophyly of Glires, but not a link between Glires and zalambdalestids. Glires are more closely related to several Tertiary taxa, including primates, leptictids, pseudictopids, anagalids, and macroscelideans. Phylogenetically constrained distributions of Glires support the conventional view for a post K-T boundary radiation of modern orders of placental mammals and disagree with conclusions of some molecular studies that divergence of Rodentia and Lagomorpha at infraordinal, ordinal, and certain supraordinal levels occurred in the Cretaceous. Current hypotheses employed to explain the discrepancy between the fossil record and the molecular clock hypothesis are not supported by phylogenetic and distributional evidence of Glires. There is no compelling evidence that close relatives of Glires were present in the Cretaceous.

Jin Meng "Chapter 7: Phylogeny and Divergence of Basal Glires," Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2004(285), 93-109, (1 June 2004). https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0090(2004)285<0093:C>2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 June 2004
Back to Top