Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T11:54:34.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shelly fossils from the Early Cambrian (Toyonian) Wirrealpa, Aroona Creek, and Ramsay Limestones of South Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Glenn A. Brock  and
Barry J. Cooper
Glenn A. Brock
Affiliation:
Earth Sciences, Macquarie University, N.S.W., Australia 2109 and Centre for Ecostratigraphy and Palaeobiology, Earth Sciences, Macquarie University, N.S.W., Australia 2109
Barry J. Cooper
Affiliation:
South Australian Department of Mines and Energy, P.O. Box 151, Eastwood, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia 5001
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Small shelly fossils from the Wirrealpa and Aroona Creek Limestones, Flinders Ranges, and the temporally equivalent Ramsay Limestone, Yorke Peninsula, South Australia, are described and assessed. These formations, deposited during a widespread marine transgression, have traditionally been assigned an early Middle Cambrian age based on lateral facies relationships, lithostratigraphic interpretation, and age diagnostic trilobites. However, new data from regional sequence stratigraphy and mounting paleontological evidence suggest that a late Early Cambrian age (equivalent to the Toyonian Stage from the Siberian Platform) is more appropriate for these units. Twenty-four taxa, including a number of problematica, poriferans, coeloscleritophorans, palaeoscolecidans, “conodontomorphs,” hyolithelminthes, hyoliths, mollusks, and inarticulate brachiopods, are reported herein; many of these have not previously been reported from the Cambrian of South Australia. The enigmatic Chalasiocranos exquisitum n. gen. and sp., known from disarticulated tuberculate cone-shaped phosphatic sclerites, and Protomelission gatehousei n. gen. and sp., a problematic, perhaps colonial organism, known from phosphatic plates, are especially notable. The genus Kaimenella is formally included in the Palaeoscolecida, and two species (including K. dailyi n. sp.) are recognized.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 67 , Issue 5 , September 1993 , pp. 758 - 787
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aksarina, N. A. 1975. Brakhiopody. Trudy Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki Sibirskogo Otdelenia, AN SSSR, Ministerstvo Geologii Uzbekskaya SSR, 278:91–100.Google Scholar
Bendix-Almgreen, S. E., and Peel, J. S. 1988. Hadimopanella from the Lower Cambrian of North Greenland: structure and affinities. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, 37:83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtson, S. 1976. The structure of some Middle Cambrian conodonts and the early evolution of conodont structure and function. Lethaia, 9:185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtson, S. 1986. Siliceous microfossils from the Upper Cambrian of Queensland. Alcheringa, 10:195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtson, S., Conway Morris, S., Cooper, B. J., Jell, P. A., and Runnegar, B. N. 1990. Early Cambrian fossils from South Australia. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, 9:1–364.Google Scholar
Bengtson, S., and Missarzhevsky, V. V. 1981. Coeloscleritophora—a major group of enigmatic Cambrian metazoans, p. 19–21. In Taylor, M. E. (ed.), Short Papers for the 2nd International Symposium on the Cambrian System. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 81–743, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1872. On some fossils from the primordial rocks of Newfoundland. Canadian Naturalist, 6:465–479.Google Scholar
Bischoff, G. C. O. 1976. Dailyatia, a new genus of the tommotiidae from Cambrian strata of SE Australia (Crustacea, Cirripedia). Senkenbergiana lethaea, 57:1–33.Google Scholar
Boogaard, van den M. 1988. Some data on Milaculum Müller, 1973. Scripta Geologica, 88:1–25.Google Scholar
Brasier, M. D. 1984. Microfossils and small shelly fossils from the Lower Cambrian Hyolithes Limestone at Nuneaton, English Midlands. Geological Magazine, 121:229–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasier, M. D., and Hewitt, R. A. 1979. Environmental setting of fossiliferous rocks from the uppermost Proterozoic–Lower Cambrian of central England. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 27:35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrett, C., and Stait, B. 1987. China and Asia as part of the Tethyan margin of Cambro-Ordovician Gondwanaland, p. 65–77. In McKenzie, K. G. (ed.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Shallow Tethys 2, Wagga Wagga, Sept., 1986. A.A. Balkema Press, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Chang, W. T. 1980. A review of the Cambrian of China. Journal of the Geological Society of Australia, 27:137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, F. 1940. On a new genus of sponges from the Cambrian of the Flinders Range, South Australia. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, 64:101–108.Google Scholar
Coats, R. P. 1973. Copley Map Sheet, Geological Atlas of South Australia. 1:250,000 series. Geological Survey of South Australia, Adelaide.Google Scholar
Cobbold, E. S. 1921. The Cambrian horizons of Comley and their Brachiopoda, Pteropoda, Gasteropoda etc. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London, 76:325–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobbold, E. S., and Pocock, R. W. 1934. The Cambrian area of Rushton (Shropshire). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 223:305–409.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S., and Menge, Chen. 1990. Tommotiids from the Lower Cambrian of South China. Journal of Paleontology, 64:169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway Morris, S., and Harper, E. 1988. Genome size in conodonts (Chordata): inferred variations during 270 million years. Science, 241:1230–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway Morris, S., Pickerill, R. K., and Harland, T. L. 1982. A possible annelid from the Trenton Limestone (Ordovician) of Quebec, with a review of fossil oligochetes and other annulate worms. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 19:2150–2157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway Morris, S., and Robison, R. A. 1986. Middle Cambrian priapulids and other soft-bodied fossils from Utah and Spain. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Paper 117:1–22.Google Scholar
Cook, P. J. 1982. The Cambrian palaeogeography of Australia and opportunities for petroleum exploration. Australian Petroleum Exploration Journal, 22:42–64.Google Scholar
Crawford, A. R. 1965. The Geology of Yorke Peninsula. Bulletin, Geological Survey of South Australia, 39:1–96.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. L. C. F. D. 1797. Tableau elementáire de l'histoire naturelle des animaúx. Paris, 710 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daily, B. 1956. The Cambrian in South Australia, p. 91–147. In Rodgers, J. (ed.), El Sistema Cambrico, su paleogeografia y el problema de su base. Report International 20th Geological Congress, Mexico, Volume 2.Google Scholar
Daily, B. 1968. Subsurface stratigraphy and palaeontology of the Cambrian sequence, Stansbury Town No. 1 well. South Australian Department of Mines, open file envelope 48 (unpublished).Google Scholar
Daily, B. 1976. The Cambrian of the Flinders Ranges. 25th International Geological Congress, Excursion Guide, 33A:15–19.Google Scholar
Daily, B. 1982. Guide to Excusion A. Archean Proterozoic and lower Palaeozoic Geology, Eyre Peninsula and the Flinders Range, South Australia, p. 37–72. In 4th International Symposium on Antarctic Earth Sciences, Adelaide.Google Scholar
Daily, B. 1990. Cambrian stratigraphy of Yorke Peninsula. Geological Society of Australia, Special Publication, 16:215–229.Google Scholar
Dalgarno, C. R. 1964. Lower Cambrian stratigraphy of the Flinders Ranges. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, 88:129–144.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F., and Gravestock, D. I. 1990. Archaeocyatha from the Sellick Hill Formation and Fork Tree Limestone on Fleurieu Peninsula, South Australia. Geological Society of Australia, Special Publication, 16:290–309.Google Scholar
Wei-Ming, Ding, and Yi, Qian. 1988. Late Sinian to Early Cambrian small shelly fossils from Yangjiaping, Shimen, Hunan. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica, 5:39–55 [in Chinese with English summary].Google Scholar
Donovan, S. K., and Paul, C. R. C. 1985. A possible new armoured worm from the Tremadoc of Sheinton, Shropshire. Proceedings of the Geological Association, 96:87–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doré, F., and Reid, R. E. 1965. Allonia tripodophora nov. gen., nov. sp., nouvelle Éponge du Cambrien inférieur du Carteret (Manche). C.R. Sommaire de séances de la Société Géologique de France, 1:20–21.Google Scholar
Chenghua, Duan. 1984. Small shelly fossils from the Lower Cambrian Xihaoping Formation in the Shennongjia District, Hubei Province—hyoliths and fossil skeletons of unknown affinities. Bulletin of the Tianjin Institute of Geological Mineralogical Research, 7:143–188 [in Chinese with English summary].Google Scholar
Duméril, A. M. C. 1806. Zoologie analytique ou methode naturelle de classification des animaux. Allais, Paris, 344 p.Google Scholar
Dzik, J. 1986. Turrilepadida and other Machaeridia, p. 116–134. In Hoffman, A. and Nitecki, M. H. (eds.), Problematic Fossil Taxa. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Eichenberg, W. 1930. Conodonten aus dem Culm des Harzes. Palaeontologisches Zeitschrift, 12:177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etheridge, R. Jr. 1905. Additions to the Cambrian fauna of South Australia. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, 29:246.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. W. 1962. Small conoidal shells of uncertain affinities, p. W98–W143. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part W, Miscellanea. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Fonin, V. D., and Smirnova, T. N. 1967. Novaya gruppa problematicheskikh rannekembrijskih organizmov i nekkotorye metody ikh preparirovaniya. Paleonotologicheskii Zhurnal, 1967(2):15–27.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A., Landing, E., and Skevington, D. 1982. Cambrian–Ordovician boundary sections in the Cow Head Group, western Newfoundland, p. 95–129. In Bassett, M. G. and Dean, W. T. (eds.), The Cambrian–Ordovician Boundary: Sections, Fossil Distributions, and Correlations. National Museum of Wales, Geological Series, 3.Google Scholar
Gatehouse, C. G., Jago, J. B., Gravestock, D. I., and Cooper, B. J. 1990. Preliminary sequence stratigraphy of the Kanmantoo Group in South Australia. Abstracts, 10th Australian Geological Convention, session A10: Gondwanaland Context and the Tasman Fold Belt, p. 192–193. Geological Society of Australia.Google Scholar
Geyer, G. 1986. Mittelkambrische Mollusken aus Marokko und Spanien. Senkenbergiana lethaea, 67:55–118.Google Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. 1979. Lower Cambrian Crustacea and annelid worms from Kangaroo Island, South Australia. Alcheringa, 3:21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1836. Outlines of Comparative Anatomy. London, 656 p.Google Scholar
Gravestock, D. I. 1984. Archaeocyatha from lower parts of the Lower Cambrian carbonate sequence in South Australia. Memoir of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, 2:1–139.Google Scholar
Gravestock, D. I. In press. Cambrian. In Geology of South Australia. Department of Mines and Energy, South Australia.Google Scholar
Grigor'yeva, N. V., and Zhegallo, Ye. A. 1979. Kissledovaniyu mikrostruktur nekotorykh tommotskikh iskopaemykh. Paleontologischeskii Zhurnal, 1979:2, 142–144.Google Scholar
Hass, W. H. 1941. Morphology of conodonts. Journal of Paleontology, 15:71–81.Google Scholar
Tinggui, He, Fang, Pei, and Guan-Hong, Fu. 1984. Some small shelly fossils from the Lower Cambrian Xinji Formation in Fangcheng County, Hunan Province. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 23:350–357 [Chinese with English summary].Google Scholar
Hinz, I. 1987. The Lower Cambrian microfauna of Comley and Rushton, Shropshire/England. Palaeontographica Abteilung A, 198:41–100.Google Scholar
Hinz, I., Kraft, P., Mergl, M., and Müller, K. J. 1990. The problematic Hadimopanella, Kaimenella, Milaculum and Utahphospha identified as sclerites of Palaeoscolecida. Lethaia, 23:217–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, G. 1893. Sveriges Kambrisk-Siluriska Hyolithidae och Conularidae. Sveringes Geologiska Undersokning, Afhandlingar och Uppsater, 112, 172 p.Google Scholar
Horný, R. J. 1963. Lower Paleozoic Bellerophontina (Gastropoda) of Bohemia. Ustred. Ustavu Geologickych, Sbornik, 28:57–164.Google Scholar
Horwitz, R. C., and Daily, B. 1958. Yorke Peninsula, p. 46–70. In Glaessner, M. F. and Parkin, L. W. (eds.), The geology of South Australia. Journal of the Geological Society of Australia, 5.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. 1869. An Introduction to the Classification of Animals. Churchill and Sons, London, 147 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jago, J. B., Daily, B. D., Von Der Borch, C. C., Cernovskis, A., and Saunders, N. 1984. First reported trilobites from the Lower Cambrian Normanville Group, Fleurieu Peninsula, South Australia. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, 108:207–211.Google Scholar
Jago, J. B., and Daily, B. D. 1982. South Australia. Geological Society of Australia, Special Publication, 9:6–12.Google Scholar
Jago, J. B., and Gravestock, D. I. 1983. Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Cambrian faunal affinities. Fourth Australian Geological Convention, Abstracts: S-5.Google Scholar
Jell, P. A. 1981. Thambetolepsis delicata gen. et sp. nov., an enigmatic fossil from the early Cambrian of South Australia. Alcheringa, 5:85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jell, P. A. 1983 The Early to Middle Cambrian boundary in Australia. Abstracts, Geological Society of Australia, 9:236.Google Scholar
Jell, P. A., Burrett, C. F., and Banks, M. R. 1985. Cambrian and Ordovician echinoderms from eastern Australia. Alcheringa, 9:183–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jell, P. A., Gravestock, D. I., and Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 1990. Yorke Peninsula (South Australia) Lower Cambrian section: a key to China-Siberia correlation. Abstracts, Third International Symposium on the Cambrian System, Novosibirsk, p. 117.Google Scholar
Jeppsson, L. 1979. Conodont element function. Lethaia, 12:153–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhiwen, Jiang. 1982. Small shelly fossils, descriptions, p. 163–200. In Luo, H. et al. (eds.), The Sinian–Cambrian boundary in eastern Yunnan, China. Peoples Republic of China [in Chinese].Google Scholar
Zhiwen, Jiang, and Zhaobi, Huang. 1986. Middle Cambrian small shelly fauna in Yaxian County, Hainan Island. Geological Review, 32:317–324 [in Chinese with English summary].Google Scholar
Kerber, M. 1988. Mikrofossilien aus unterkambrischen Gesteinen der Montagne Noire, Frankreich. Palaeontographica Abteilung A, 202:127–303.Google Scholar
King, W. 1846. Remarks on certain genera belonging to the class Palliobranchiata. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 18:26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, J. T. 1734. Naturalis dispositio Echinodermatum. Gedani, 78 p.Google Scholar
Knight, J. B. 1952. Primitive fossil gastropods and their bearing on gastropod classification. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 117(13):1–56.Google Scholar
Knight, J. B. 1956. New families of Gastropoda. Journal of the Washington Academy of Science, 46:41–42.Google Scholar
Koneva, S. P. 1986. Novoe semeystvo kembriykikh bezzamkovykh brakhiopod. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, 1:49–55.Google Scholar
Kraft, P., and Mergl, M. 1989. Worm-like fossils (Palaeoscolecida, ?Chetognatha) from the Lower Ordovician of Bohemia. Sbornik Geologickych Ved Paleontologie, 30:9–36.Google Scholar
Krause, F. F., and Rowell, A. J. 1975. Distribution and systematics of the inarticulate brachiopods of the Ordovician carbonate mud mound of Meiklejohn Peak, Nevada. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, 61:1–74.Google Scholar
Kruse, P. 1990. Cambrian palaeontology of the Daly Basin. Northern Territory Geological Survey, Report 7:1–58.Google Scholar
Kruse, P. 1991. Cyanobacterial-archaeocyathan-radiocyathan bioherms in the Wirrealpa Limestone of South Australia. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 28:601–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, O. 1949. Lehrbuch der Palaozoologie. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, 326 p.Google Scholar
Landing, E. 1988. Lower Cambrian of eastern Massachusetts: stratigraphy and small shelly fossils. Journal of Paleontology, 62:661–695.Google Scholar
Laurie, J. R. 1986. Phosphatic fauna of the Early Cambrian Todd River Dolomite, Amadeus Basin, central Australia. Alcheringa, 10:431–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurie, J. R., and Shergold, J. H. 1985. Phosphatic organisms and the correlation of early Cambrian carbonate formations in central Australia. Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics, 9:83–89.Google Scholar
Linnarsson, J. G. O. 1871. Om några försteningar från Sveriges och Norges “Primordialzon.” Ofversigt af Konglische Vetenskaps-Akademiens Förhandlingar, 6:789–796.Google Scholar
Ludbrook, N. H. 1965. Minlaton and Stansbury stratigraphic bores—subsurface stratigraphy and micropalaeontology. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of South Australia, Appendix, 39:83–95.Google Scholar
Huilin, Luo, Zhiwen, Jiang, Xiche, Wu, Xueliang, Song, Lin, Ouyang, Yusheng, Xing, Guizhi, Lui, Shishan, Zhang, and Yonghe, Tao. 1982. The Sinian–Cambrian Boundary in Eastern Yunan, China. Peoples Republic of China, 265 p. [in Chinese with English summary].Google Scholar
McCoy, F. 1851. A systematic description of the British Palaeozoic fossils in the Geological Museum of the University of Cambridge. In Sedgwick, A., A synopsis of the classification of the British Palaeozoic rocks, 1. London, 184 p.Google Scholar
Marek, L. 1963. New knowledge on the morphology of Hyolithes. Sbornik Geologickych Ved, Paleontoligie, 9:51–72.Google Scholar
Märss, T. 1988. Early Palaeozoic hadimopanellids of Estonia and Kirgizia (USSR). Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the Estonian SSR, Geology, 37:10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1894. Illustrations of the fauna of the St. John Group. No. 8. Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, 11:85–129.Google Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1895. The Protolenus fauna. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 14:101–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1899. The Etcheminian fauna of Smith Sound, Newfoundland. Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, 5:97–119.Google Scholar
Menke, C. T. 1828. Synopsis methodica molluscorum generum omnium et specierium earum quae in Museo Menkeano adservantur. Pyrmonti, 91 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meshkova, N. P. 1974. Khiolity iz nizhenego Kembriya Sibirskoy Platformy. Trudy Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki Sibirskogo Otdelenia AN SSSR, 97:1–110.Google Scholar
Missarzhevsky, V. V. 1973. Konodontoobraznye organizmy iz pogranichnykh sloev kembriya i dokembriya Sibirskoy platformy i Kazakhstana, p. 53–57. In Zhuravleva, I. T. (ed.), Problemy Paleontologii i Biostratigrafii Nizhnego kembriya Sibiri i Dal'nego Vostoka. Trudy Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki Sibirskogo Otdelenia AN SSSR, 49.Google Scholar
Missarzhevsky, V. V. 1989. Drevneishie skeletnye okamenelosti i stratigrafiya Pogranichnyh Tolsch. Trudy Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki, 443:1–237.Google Scholar
Missarzhevsky, V. V., and Mambetov, A. M. 1981. Stratigrafiya i fauna pogranichnykh sloev kembryia i dokembriya Malogo Karatau. Trudy Geologicheskogo Instituta AN SSSR, 326:1–92.Google Scholar
Mostler, H., and Mosleh-Yazdi, A. 1976. Neue Poriferen aus oberkambrischen Gesteinen der Milaformation im Elburzgebirge (Iran). Geologisch-Paläontologische Mitteilungen Innsbruck, 5:1–36.Google Scholar
Müller, K. J. 1973. Milaculum n. g., ein phosphatisches Mikrofossil aus dem Altpaläozoikium. Paläontologisches Zeitschrift, 47:217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, K. J., and Miller, J. F. 1976. The problematic microfossil Utahphospha from the Upper Cambrian of the western United States. Lethaia, 9:391–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, K. J., and Nogami, Y. 1971. Über den Feinbau der Conodonten. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyoto University, Series of Geology and Mineralogy, 38:1–87.Google Scholar
Müller, K. J., and Walossek, D. 1987. Morphology, ontogeny and life habits of Agnostus pisiformis from the Upper Cambrian of Sweden. Fossils and Strata, 19:1–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowlan, G. S., Narbonne, G. M., and Fritz, W. H. 1985. Small shelly fossils and trace fossils near the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary in the Yukon Territory, Canada. Lethaia, 18:233–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öpik, A. A. 1967. The Ordian Stage of the Cambrian and its Australian Metadoxididae. Bulletin, Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, Australia, 92:133–170.Google Scholar
Öpik, A. A. 1970. Redlichia of the Ordian (Cambrian) of Northern Australia and New South Wales. Bulletin, Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, Australia, 114:1–67.Google Scholar
Öpik, A. A. 1975. Templetonian and Ordian xystridurid trilobites of Australia. Bulletin, Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, Australia, 121:1–84.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1977. Biostratigraphy of the Cambrian System—a progress report. Annual Review of Earth Planetary Science, 5:13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pel'man, Yu. L. 1977. Ranne i srednekembryskie bezzamkovye brakhiopody Sibirskoy Platformy. Trudy Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki Sibirskogo Otdelenia, AN SSSR, 36:1–168.Google Scholar
Pierce, R. W., and Langenheim, R. L. Jr. 1970. Surface patterns on selected Mississippian conodonts. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 81:3225–3236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, K. J. 1964. Estaingia, a new trilobite genus from the Lower Cambrian of South Australia. Palaeontology, 7:458–471.Google Scholar
Pocock, K. J. 1970. The Emuellidae, a new family of trilobites from the Lower Cambrian of South Australia. Palaeontology, 13:522–562.Google Scholar
Pojeta, J. Jr., and Runnegar, B. 1976. The paleontology of rostroconch mollusks and the early history of the phylum Mollusca. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 968:1–88.Google Scholar
Yi, Qian. 1977. Hyolitha and some problematica from the Lower Cambrian Meishucunian Stage in central and SW China. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 16:255–278. [in Chinese with English summary].Google Scholar
Qian, Yi., and Bengtson, S. 1989. Palaeontology and biostratigraphy of the Early Cambrian Meishucunian Stage in Yunnan Province, South China. Fossils and Strata, 24:1–156.Google Scholar
Repetski, J. E. 1981. An Ordovician occurrence of Utahphospha Müller and Miller. Journal of Paleontology, 55:395–400.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1978. Porifera of the Middle Cambrian Wheeler Shale, from the Wheeler Amphitheater, House Range, in western Utah. Journal of Paleontology, 52:1325–1345.Google Scholar
Roberts, J., and Jell, P. A. 1990. Early Middle Cambrian (Ordian) brachiopods of the Coonigan Formation, western New South Wales. Alcheringa, 14:257–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1969. Annelids from the Middle Cambrian Spence Shale of Utah. Journal of Paleontology, 45:796–804.Google Scholar
Romanenko, E. V. 1968. Cambrian sponges of the order Heteractinellida of Altai. Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, 1968(2):134–136.Google Scholar
Rowell, A. J. 1966. Revision of some Cambrian and Ordovician inarticulate brachiopods. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, 7:1–36.Google Scholar
Rowell, A. J. 1980. Inarticulate brachiopods of the Lower and Middle Cambrian Pioche Shale of the Pioche district, Nevada. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, 98:1–26.Google Scholar
Rozanov, A. Yu., and Missarzhevsky, V. V. 1966. Biostratigrafiya i fauna nizhnikh gorizontov kembriya. Trudy Geologicheskogo Instituta AN SSSR, 148:1–126.Google Scholar
Rozanov, A. Yu., Missarzhevsky, V. V., Volkova, N. A., Voronova, L. G., Krylov, I. N., Keller, B. M., Korolyuk, I. K., Lendzion, K., Michniak, R., Pukhova, N. G., and Sidorov, A. D. 1969. Tommotskij yarus i problema nizhnej granitsy kembriya. Trudy Geologicheskogo Instituta AN SSSR, 296:1–380.Google Scholar
Rozanov, A. Yu., and Sokolov, B. S. (eds.). 1984. Yarusnoe raschlenenie nizhnego kembriya, Stratigrafiya. Nauka, Moskva, 184 p.Google Scholar
Runnegar, B. 1981. Muscle scars, shell, form and torsion in Cambrian and Ordovician univalved molluscs. Lethaia, 14:311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runnegar, B. 1983. Molluscan phylogeny revisited. Memoir of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, 1:121–144.Google Scholar
Runnegar, B., and Jell, P. A. 1976. Australian Middle Cambrian molluscs and their bearing on early molluscan evolution. Alcheringa, 1:109–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runnegar, B., and Pojeta, J. 1974. Molluscan pylogeny: the palaeontological viewpoint. Science, 186:311–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1866. Appendix. On the fossils of North Wales. Great Britain Geological Survey Memoir, 3:240–381.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O. 1870. Grundzuge einer Spongien-fauna des atlantischen Gebietes. Leipzig, 88 p.Google Scholar
Schuchert, C. 1893. A classification of the Brachiopoda. American Geologist, 11:141–167.Google Scholar
Sdzuy, K. 1969. Unter- und mittelkambrische Porifera (Chancelloriida und Hexactinellida). Palaontologische Zeitschrift, 43:115–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shergold, J. H. 1986. Review of the Cambrian and Ordovician palaeontology of the Amadeus Basin, central Australia. Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, Australia, Report 276:1–21.Google Scholar
Shergold, J. H., Jago, J. B., Cooper, R. A., and Laurie, J. R. 1985. The Cambrian System in Australia, Antarctica and New Zealand. Correlation charts and explanatory notes. International Union of Geological Sciences, Publication, 19:1–85.Google Scholar
Sysoiev, V. A. 1958. The Superorder Hyolithoidea, p. 184–190. In Fundamentals of Paleontology. Akadameyia Nauk SSSR, 2.Google Scholar
Szaniawski, H. 1982. Chaetognath grasping spines recognised among Cambrian protoconodonts. Journal of Paleontology, 56:806–810.Google Scholar
Ushatinskaya, G. T., Gidaspov, A. D., and Ryazantsev, A. V. 1986. Middle Cambrian inarticulate brachiopods from central Kazakhstan. Palaeontological Journal, 1986(3):35–40.Google Scholar
Vasil'yeva, N. I., and Sayutina, T. A. 1988. Morfologicheskioe raznoobrazie skleritov khantsellorij. Trudy Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki Sibirskogo Otdelenia, AN SSSR, 720:190–198.Google Scholar
Veevers, J. J. (ed.). 1984. Phanerozoic Earth History of Australia. Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics, 2:1–418.Google Scholar
Voronin, Yu. I., Voronova, L. G., Grigor'eva, N. V., Drozdova, N. A., Zhegallo, E. A., Zhuravlev, A. Yu., Ragozina, A. L., Rozanov, A. Yu., Sayutina, T. A., Sysoev, V. A., and Fonin, V. D. 1982. Granitsa dokembriya i kembriya v geosinklinal'nykh oblastyakh opornyj razrez Salany-Gol, MNR. Trudy Sovmestnaya Sovetsko-Mongol'skaya Paleontologicheskaya Ehkspeditsya, 18:1–150.Google Scholar
Voronova, L. G., Drozdova, N. A., Esakova, N. V., Zhegallo, E. A., Zhuravlev, A. Yu., Rozanov, A. Yu., Sayutina, T. A., and Ushatinskaya, G. T. 1987. Iskopaemye nizhnego kembriya Gor Makkenzi (Kanada). Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta AN SSSR, 224:1–88.Google Scholar
Waagen, W. H. 1885. Salt Range fossils, Brachiopoda. Palaeontologia Indica, 4(2):729–770.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1902. Cambrian Brachiopoda: Acrotreta; Linnarssonella; Obolus; with descriptions of new species. Proceedings of the U.S National Museum, 25:577–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1908. Cambrian geology and Palaeontology. 3. Cambrian Brachiopoda, descriptions of new genera and species. 4. Classification and terminology of the Cambrian Brachiopoda. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 53:53–165.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1912. Cambrian Brachiopoda. U.S. Geological Survey, Monographs, 51:(I)1–872, (II)1–363.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1920. Middle Cambrian Spongiae. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 67:261–364.Google Scholar
Walter, M. R. 1967. Archaeocyatha and the biostratigraphy of the Lower Cambrian Hawker Group, South Australia. Journal of the Geological Society of Australia, 14:139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenz, W. 1938. Gastropoda, Teil 1, 2, Prosobranchia, Volume 6, p. 241–480. In Schinderwolf, Ö. H., Handbuch der Paläozoologie. Berlin.Google Scholar
Whittard, W. F. 1953. Palaeoscolex piscatorum gen. et sp. nov., a worm from the Tremadocian of Shropshire. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 109:125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilmot, N. V. 1990. Cuticular structure of the agnostine trilobite Homagnostus obesus. Lethaia, 23:87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrona, R. 1982. Early Cambrian phosphatic microfossils from southern Spitzbergen (Hornsund region). Palaeontologia Polonica, 43:9–16.Google Scholar
Wrona, R. 1987. Cambrian microfossil Hadimopanella Gedik from glacial erratics in West Antarctica. Palaeontologia Polonica, 49:37–48.Google Scholar
Wrona, R. 1989. Cambrian limestone erratics in the Tertiary glacio-marine sediments of King George Island, West Antarctica. Polish Polar Research, 10:533–553.Google Scholar
Ligong, Xiao, and Benhe, Zhou. 1984. Early Cambrian Hyolitha from Huainan and Huoqiu County in Anhui Province. Professional Papers in Stratigraphy and Palaeontology, 13:141–151 [in Chinese].Google Scholar
Youngs, B. C. 1977. The sedimentology of the Cambrian Wirrealpa and Aroona Creek Limestones. Bulletin, Geological Survey of South Australia, 47:1–73.Google Scholar
Zell, M. G., and Rowell, A. J. 1988. Brachiopods of the Holm Dal Formation (late Middle Cambrian), central North Greenland. Meddelelser om Grønland Geoscience, 20:119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wentang, Zhang, and Jell, P. A. 1987. Cambrian Trilobites of North China. Chinese trilobites housed in the Smithsonian Institution. Science Press, Beijing, 459 p.Google Scholar
Benhe, Zhou, and Ligong, Xiao. 1984. Early Cambrian monoplacophorans and gastropods from Huainan and Huoqu counties, Anhui Province. Professional Papers in Stratigraphy and Palaeontology, 13:150–151 [in Chinese with English summary].Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. 1877. Studien uber fossile Spongien. Abhandlüngen. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 12(2):1–63.Google Scholar