Global talent management and global talent challenges: Strategic opportunities for IHRM
Introduction
In describing the competitiveness of nation in relationship to each other, Porter (1990) conceptualized four key attributes that are often referred to as “Porter's Diamond,” Briefly, the four include: strategy, structure and rivalry; demand conditions; supply networks; and factor endowments. Factor endowments refer to a country's productive capabilities, including the qualities and characteristics of its workforce, its natural resources and infrastructure. Increasingly, these factor endowments, particularly the workforces of countries around the world, have received extensive discussion for several reasons. One is that workforces around the world have expanded, both quantitatively and qualitatively. A second one is the expansion of economies and businesses globally, thus increasing the need for larger workforces. A third is that the compensation levels of these workforces vary dramatically across countries, even for comparably skilled workers. The fourth reason is, and following from the previous three, is that firms see that they are able to gain and sustain a global competitive advantage when they manage their workforces effectively (Bryan, 2010, Gupta and Govindarajan, 2001, Porter, 1990). To do so successfully, we propose that these firms must confront the reality of several global talent challenges and develop global talent management initiatives to address these challenges.
Beginning in the late 1990s, firms around the world were confronted with a major threat to doing business: a demand for talented employees that far surpassed the supply, thus creating a global talent shortage (Chambers et al., 1998, Michaels et al., 2001). As a consequence, “talent acquisition, retention and management” became a key expression (challenge) in global business (Guthridge, Komm, & Lawson, 2008). The interest in this challenge came to be embraced with the label of “global talent management” or GTM (Beechler & Woodward, 2009). Reflecting the wide acceptance of GTM after the seminal book entitled The War for Talent (Michaels et al., 2001), several special issues of academic journals such at the Journal of World Business (Scullion, Collings, & Caliguri, 2010) and the Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resource Management (McDonnell, Collings, & Burgess, in press) and books such as Global Talent Management by Scullion and Collings (2011), Strategy-Driven Talent Management (Silzer & Dowell, 2010) and Talent Management of Knowledge Employees (Vaiman, 2010) were published. The major focus of these works was on corporations obtaining and managing a sufficient number of highly talented individuals (also known as “valuable contributors” including high level executives, those with high managerial potential, and those with rare technical skills) to deal with the challenge of the global talent shortage (Beechler and Woodward, 2009, Guthridge et al., 2008).
While the global talent shortage remains a significant human resource talent challenge for global firms, equally significant global talent challenges have emerged. These include those associated with the need to: (a) reduce and remove talent in order to lower the costs of operations; (b) locate and relocate of operations around the world; and (c) obtain equally competent talent anywhere in the world at lower wages (Guthridge et al., 2008, Lohr, 2010). Collectively, these challenges have become significant because of their strategic value and impact to the success of global firms (Guthridge et al., 2008, Lohr, 2010). Because of their common association with global talent, they have come to be known as “global talent challenges (GTCs).” These deal with through human resource policies and practices that have their roots in global talent management. When these policies and practices are systematically focused on these global talent challenges, they can be referred to as “global talent management initiatives (GTMs)” (Schuler, Jackson, & Tarique, 2011). The traditional treatment of “global talent management” is being expanded here to encompass additional global talent challenges. This work is built upon the suggestions of Scullion and Collings (2011), Tarique and Schuler (2010), and is consistent with some of the work on the traditional discussion of GTM (Guthridge et al. (2008).
This article begins by describing these global talent challenges and global talent management, as well as by describing some of the events that have produced this expanded treatment of “global talent management.” As such, some of our discussion reflects conditions that were present during recent economic and financial boom times (i.e., the years leading up to 2008), when worker shortages were a primary concern. Economic expansion is likely to return, so labor shortages are likely to be of continuing concern, particularly in the rapidly emerging economies, such as China, India and Brazil (Jorek, Gott, & Battat, 2009). Regardless of the size of the gap between the available and desired pool of talent globally, however, human resource location and relocation, and cost reduction through lower compensation levels are likely to become major global talent challenges over the next several years (The Economist, 2010a, The Economist, 2010a, The Economist, 2010b).
Section snippets
Global talent challenges and global talent management
In today's rapidly moving, extremely uncertain, and highly competitive global environment, firms worldwide are encountering numerous global talent challenges. Global talent challenges are significant (strategic and high impact) HR-embedded business issues that focus on managing a firm to ensure just the right amount of the right talent and motivation, at the right place, at the right price, during all economic and financial ups and downs in a very competitive world for the purposes of balancing
Major forces and shapers of the global talent challenges
In the discussion and conceptualization of global talent challenges, context is extremely important. Fig. 1 depicts the framework of the major contextual forces and shapers of GTCs and several HR policies and practices used in crafting global management talent initiatives to manage global talent challenges. We propose that an understanding of the realities and trends of these contextual forces and shapers is essential to identifying the GTCs and crafting the appropriate GTM initiatives. Thus we
HR policies and practices for GTM initiatives to address global talent challenges
Due in part to the existence of many forces and shapers of the global talent challenges, there are many possible HR policies and practices that firms can use in their global talent management initiatives (Beechler & Woodward, 2009). Matching an accurate diagnosis of a firm's strategy and talent management situation with possible HR policies and practices is a first step in gaining and sustaining a global competitive advantage that may result from the successful implementation of the appropriate
Role of HR professionals
In a classic study entitled The War for Talent (Michaels et al., 2001), it was found that HR professionals spent a great deal of their time formulating and managing the HR policies and practices, such as recruiting, selecting, training, performance appraisal and compensation in a more traditional, administrative manner. While this can be important in managing human resources generally, their effectiveness in managing global talent management initiatives results from being linked with the firm's
Results of effective HR policies and practices for GTM initiatives
As shown in Fig. 1, there are several potential results that are likely to follow from HR policies and practices of GTM initiatives that successfully address a firm's global talent challenges. In particular, we have argued that addressing the global talent challenges improves the firm's success in having the right people at the right place at the right time with the needed competencies and motivation and at the right price at all levels and all locations (positions) of the firms (Guthridge et
Barriers to global talent management initiatives
It seems apparent that multinational firms have good reason to invest considerable resources in meeting the global talent challenges they face. The success in this endeavor, however, remains elusive. Based on the responses of more than 1300 executives worldwide, Guthridge et al. (2008) identified several barriers to the use of HR policies and practices for global talent management initiatives. Many of these barriers to successful GTM initiatives exist for domestic firms, but they become more
Managerial relevance
Many of the most pressing global challenges facing global firms today are directly associated with several significant global talent challenges. These global talent challenges arise due to the ever-changing drivers and shapers in the environment. In particular, among the major drivers and shapers are: enhanced globalization, evolving demographics, the need for more competencies and motivation, and the growing shortage/surplus of needed competencies and motivation as depicted in Fig. 1. For
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to express thanks for preparatory comments and suggestions to Dave Collings, Paul Sparrow, Mark Saxer, Hugh Scullion, John Slocum, Ken Smith, Rosalie Tung and Nadia Wicki de la Puente. Supported by a grant from the School of Management and Labor Relations, Rutgers University. Based on our presentations at the 11th IHRM Conference, Aston Business School, June 10, 2010 and the Lancaster University Management School, June 4, 2010.
References (102)
- et al.
Global talent management
Journal of International Management
(2009) - et al.
The role of the corporate HR function in global talent management
Journal of World Business
(2010) - et al.
Framework and review of global talent management and suggestions for future research
Journal of World Business
(2010) - et al.
Transnational managers: A different expatriate experience
International Studies of Management and Organization
(2005) Supply chain for iPhone highlights costs in China
The New York Times
(2010)- et al.
Why do management practices differ across firms and countries?
Journal of Economic Perspectives
(2010) Cutting costs without cutting jobs
Business Week
(2009)Investors seek Asian options to costly china
The New York Times
(2008)China drawing high-tech research from U.S.
The New York Times
(2010)- et al.
Strike in China highlights gap in workers’ pay
The New York Times
(2010)
Pressing concerns for Japanese talent management
Globalization's critical imbalances
The McKinsey Quarterly
Talent on demand
A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about international business
Talent management
The war for talent
The McKinsey Quarterly
Multinational corporations in China: Finding and keeping talent
SHRM
A fresh look at strategy under uncertainty: an interview
McKinsey Quarterly
Growth and competitiveness in the United States: The role of multinational companies
McKinsey Global Institute Report
International business: Environment and operations
How Chinese companies can succeed abroad
McKinsey Quarterly
Strategic planning: Three tips for 2009
The McKinsey Quarterly
Outsourcing the drug industry
Business Week
Nokia's new home in Romania
Business Week
America and the world: We’re no. 40!
DemocracyJournal.org
The world is flat
A word from the wise
The New York Times
Global talent management at HSBC
Organizational Development Journal
Building a second home in China
McKinsey Quarterly
The five types of successful acquisitions
McKinsey on Finance
The new population bomb
Foreign Affairs
Global compensation
How to make an American job before it's too late
Bloomberg Business Week
Converting global presence into global competitive advantage
Academy of Management Executive
Why multinationals struggle to manage talent
The McKinsey Quarterly
Making talent management a strategic priority
The McKinsey Quarterly
International isn’t just IBM's first name
Business Week
HR in the downturn
Workforce Management
A narrowing window for foreign workers?
Business Week
International business: Competing in the global marketplace (6e)
Working all corners in a global talent hunt
The New York Times
The differentiated workforce
The enterprise of the future
The shifting geography of offshoring
How to address China's growing talent shortage
McKinsey Quarterly
Global strategy stabilized I.B.M. during the downturn
The New York Times
Designer gains foothold in China with a local partner's help
The New York Times
A British fan manufacturer goes where its customers are
The New York Times
Cited by (307)
Innovation ecosystems and national talent competitiveness: A country-based comparison using fsQCA
2023, Technological Forecasting and Social ChangeFinancial Perspectives on Human Capital: Building Sustainable HR Strategies
2024, Sustainability (Switzerland)Global Talent Management: A Critical Review and Research Agenda for the New Organizational Reality
2024, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational BehaviorGlobal talent management – talents, mobility and global experiences – a systematic literature review
2024, Journal of Global MobilityLeveraging Artificial Intelligence for Talent Management
2024, Handbook of Artificial Intelligence Applications for Industrial Sustainability: Concepts and Practical ExamplesAn Institutional Perspective on Strategic Alignment of International Human Resource Management in Multinational Enterprises
2024, International Trade Journal