Skip to main content
Log in

Prioritizing Groundwater Monitoring in Data Sparse Regions using Atanassov Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets (A-IFS)

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water quality index (WQI) is a single measure that is commonly used to prioritize water wells and manage groundwater resources. WQI is pragmatic as it combines several water quality parameters into a single index. However, the process of aggregation is imprecise and suffers from uncertainties in measurements and subjective specification of weights. The goal of this study is to demonstrate how Atanassov’s Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets (A-IFS) can be used to aggregate water quality parameters into a composite index to rank and prioritize groundwater wells. The A-IFS weighted geometric mean (A-IFS-WGM) method and the A-IFS based Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (A-IFS-TOPSIS) using Euclidean (A-IFS-TOPSIS-E) and Hamming (A-IFS-TOPSIS-H) are introduced and illustrated to prioritize and rank water supply wells in a fast growing yet poorly studied area in Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India. The concept of A-IFS entropy is also presented to directly ascertain weights from the data. This objective selection of weights from the data eliminates the subjectivity and difficulties associated with assigning relative importance to different water quality parameters. The results of the study indicate that the weights obtained using the entropy methods are consistent with the geochemical characteristics of the regional aquifer. The A-IFS-WGM method is more sensitive to weights compared to the A-IFS-TOPSIS methods which are influenced to a larger extent by the membership and non-membership values (ratings). Special consideration must be placed on ascribing the hesitation margin of the decision maker and identifying the membership values for non-preference as the methods exhibit greater sensitivity to these factors. The developed methods provide pragmatic data-driven approaches to prioritize and rank groundwater wells within a monitoring network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S-M, Tan J-M (1994) Handling multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 67(2):163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen T-Y, Li C-H (2010) Determining objective weights with intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measures: a comparative analysis. Inf Sci 180(21):4207–4222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das S, Dutta B, Guha D (2016) Weight computation of criteria in a decision-making problem by knowledge measure with intuitionistic fuzzy set and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set. Soft Comput 20(9):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Express News (2016). Water scarcity looms large on guntur city this summer, The New Indian Express. Retrieved from http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/andhra_pradesh/Water-Scarcity-Looms-Large-on-Guntur-City-This-Summer/2016/02/27/article3299273.ece

  • Guo K, Song Q (2014) On the entropy for Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets: An interpretation from the perspective of amount of knowledge. Appl Soft Comput 24:328–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallgren KA (2012) Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 8(1):23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi H, Bazargan J, Mousavi SM (2013) A compromise ratio method with an application to water resources management: an intuitionistic fuzzy set. Water Resour Manag 27(7):2029–2051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez EA, Uddameri V (2010) Selecting agricultural best management practices for water conservation and quality improvements using Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Water Resour Manag 24(15):4589–4612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong DH, Choi C-H (2000) Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114(1):103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang G, Liu Y (2005) The fuzzy entropy of vague sets based on non-fuzzy sets. Comput Appl Soft 22(6):16–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang C-L, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-ofthe-art survey. Springer-Verlag, New York

  • Kirkwood CW (1996) Strategic decision making. Duxbury Press, Belmont

  • APCRDA (2016) Draft perspective plan 2050 for Andhra Pradesh capital region. Andra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority Master Plans. https://crda.ap.gov.in/APCRDA/Userinterface/HTML/masterplansNew.htm. Accessed 26 April 2016

  • Li D-F (2005) Multiattribute decision making models and methods using intuitionistic fuzzy sets. J Comput Syst Sci 70(1):73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patki VK, Shrihari S, Manu B, Deka PC (2015) Fuzzy system modeling for forecasting water quality index in municipal distribution system. Urban Water J 12(2):89–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pei Z, Zheng L (2012) A novel approach to multi-attribute decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Expert Syst Appl 39(3):2560–2566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian SS (2009) Environmental and ecological statistics with R: CRC Press: Taylor & Francis Group, New York

  • Ramakrishnaiah C, Sadashivaiah C, Ranganna G (2009) Assessment of water quality index for the groundwater in Tumkur Taluk, Karnataka State, India. J Chem 6(2):523–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena V, Ahmed S (2001) Dissolution of fluoride in groundwater: a water-rock interaction study. Environ Geol 40(9):1084–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen F, Xu J, Xu Z (2016) An outranking sorting method for multi-criteria group decision making using intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 334:338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subba Rao N (2003) Groundwater quality: focus on fluoride concentration in rural parts of Guntur district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Hydrol Sci J 48(5):835–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swamee PK, Tyagi A (2000) Describing water quality with aggregate index. J Environ Eng 126(5):451–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2001) Entropy for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 118(3):467–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2005) New measures of entropy for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In Ninth Int Conf IFSs Sofia 11(2):12–20

  • Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J, Bujnowski P (2014) How to measure the amount of knowledge conveyed by Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 257:276–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terrado M, Barceló D, Tauler R, Borrell E, de Campos S (2010) Surface-water-quality indices for the analysis of data generated by automated sampling networks. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 29(1):40–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uddameri V, Honnungar V (2007) Combining rough sets and GIS techniques to assess aquifer vulnerability characteristics in the semi-arid South Texas. Environ Geol 51(6):931–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2014) Work breakdown structure-based cost models for drinking water treatment technologies. USEPA National Service Center for Environmental Publications. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P100MYKY.PDF?Dockey=P100MYKY.PDF. Accessed 30 June 2016

  • Vlachos IK, Sergiadis GD (2007) Intuitionistic fuzzy information–applications to pattern recognition. Pattern Recogn Lett 28(2):197–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Lei Y-J (2007) A technique for constructing intuitionistic fuzzy entropy. Control and Decision 22(12):1390

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Yager RR (2006) Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Gen Syst 35(4):417–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye J (2010) Two effective measures of intuitionistic fuzzy entropy. Computing 87(1–2):55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q-S, Jiang S-Y (2008) A note on information entropy measures for vague sets and its applications. Inf Sci 178(21):4184–4191

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Annette Hernandez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 398 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singaraju, S., Pasupuleti, S., Hernandez, E.A. et al. Prioritizing Groundwater Monitoring in Data Sparse Regions using Atanassov Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets (A-IFS). Water Resour Manage 32, 1483–1499 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1883-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1883-3

Keywords

Navigation