Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Topography Mediates the Response of Soil CO2 Efflux to Precipitation Over Days, Seasons, and Years

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spatiotemporal heterogeneity in soil CO2 efflux (FS) underlies one of our greatest gaps in understanding global carbon (C) cycles. Though scientists recognize this heterogeneity, FS sampling schemes often average across spatial heterogeneity or fail to capture fine temporal heterogeneity, and many ecosystem models assume flat terrain. Here, we test the idea that simple, remotely sensible terrain variables improve regression models of spatiotemporal variation in FS. We used automatic chambers that, for the first time, capture FS in complex temperate forest terrain at fine temporal resolution with 177,477 hourly FS measurements at 8 locations from ridgetop to valley along planar and swale hillslopes, across three years ranging from dry to record wet precipitation. In two of these years, we measured FS weekly at 50 additional locations distributed across the 8-ha catchment. Growing season Fs estimates were 1.25 times greater when sampling hourly versus weekly. At ridgetops, growing season FS increased by an average of 463 gC m−2 180 day−1 (75.9%) from dry to wet years, while valleys decreased by 208 gC m−2 180 day−1 (− 20.1%). This bidirectional response to interannual moisture was identified in distinct Random Forest models of Fs for convergent (water accumulating) or non-convergent (water shedding) hillslope positions. We hypothesize that different FS constraints drive these opposing responses—water availably to biota limits FS from ridgetops while slow oxygen diffusion limits FS from wet valleys. Accounting for hillslope position and shape reduces variance of FS estimates in complex terrain, which could improve FS sampling, C budgets, and modeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19:716–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews DM, Lin H, Zhu Q, Jin L, Brantley SL. 2011. Hot Spots and Hot Moments of Dissolved Organic Carbon Export and Soil Organic Carbon Storage in the Shale Hills Critical Zone Observatory. Vadose Zone Journal 10:943–954.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arrhenius, S. 1889. On the Reaction Velocity of the Inversion of Cane Sugar by Acids. Zeitschrift für physikalische Chemie 4: 226ff.

  • Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series b. 57:289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt ES, Blaszczak JR, Ficken CD, Fork ML, Kaiser KE, Seybold EC. 2017. Control Points in Ecosystems: Moving Beyond the Hot Spot Hot Moment Concept. Ecosystems 20:665–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berryman EM, Barnard HR, Adams HR, Burns MA, Gallo E, Brooks PD. 2015. Complex terrain alters temperature and moisture limitations of forest soil respiration across a semiarid to subalpine gradient. Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeoscience 120.

  • Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ. 1979. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Journal 24:43–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond-Lamberty B, Thomson A. 2010. Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record. Nature 464:7288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond-Lamberty B, Christianson DS, Malhotra A, Pennington SC, Sihi D, AghaKouchak A, et al. 2020. COSORE: A community database for continuous soil respiration and other soil-atmosphere greenhouse gas flux data. Global Change Biology 26:7268–7283.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brændholt A, Larsen KS, Ibrom A, Pilegaard K. 2017. Overestimation of closed-chamber soil CO2 efflux at low atmospheric turbulence. Biogeosciences 14:1603–1616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brantley S, White T, West N, Williams J, Forsythe B, Shapich D, … Gu X. 2018. Susquehanna Shale Hills Critical Zone Observatory: Shale Hills in the Context of Shaver’s Creek Watershed. Vadose Zone Journal 17.

  • Breiman L. 2001. Random Forests. Machine Learning 45:5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L, Cutler A. 2018. Breiman and Cutler’s Random Forests for Classification and Regression. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/randomForest/randomForest.pdf

  • Bryla DR, Bouma TJ, Eissenstat DM. 1997. Root respiration in citrus acclimates to temperature and slows during drought. Plant Cell and Environment 20:1411–1420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark MP, Fan Y, Lawrence DM, Adam JC, Bolster D, Gochis DJ, Hooper RP, Kumar M, Leung LR, Mackay DS, Maxwell RM, Shen C, Sweson SC, Zeng X. 2015. Improving the representation of hydrologic processes in Earth System Models. Water Resources Research 51:5929–5956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtois EA, Stahl C, Burban B, Van den Berge J, Berveiller D, Bréchet L, Soong JL, Arriga N, Peñuelas J, Janssens IA. 2019. Automatic high-frequency measurements of full soil greenhouse gas fluxes in a tropical forest. Biogeosciences 16:785–796.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dai Y, Dickinson RE, Wang Y. 2004. A Two-Big-Leaf Model for Canopy Temperature, Photosynthesis, and Stomatal Conductance. Journal of Climate 17:2281–2299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson EA, Belk E, Boone RD. 1998. Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest. Global Change Biology 4:217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson EA, Samanta S, Caramori SS, Savage K. 2011. Dual Arrhenius and Michaelis-Menten kinetics model for decomposition of organic matter at hourly to seasonal time scales. Global Change Biology 18(1):371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran JW, Mielke IN, Power JF. 1991. Microbial activity as regulated by soil water-filled pore space. In: Ecology of Soil Microorganisms in the Microhabital Environments (pp 94–99). Transactions of the 14th Int. Congress of Soil Sci. Symposium.

  • Eissenstat D, Wubbles J, Adams T, Osborne J. 2013. Susquehanna Shale Hills Critical Zone Observatory Tree Survey (2008). Integrated Earth Data Applications (IEDA). https://doi.org/10.1594/IEDA/100268.

  • Fierer N, Schimel JP. 2002. Effects of drying–rewetting frequency on soil carbon and nitrogen transformations. Soil Biology & Biogeochemistry 34:777–787.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Friedlingstein P, Meinshausen M, Arora V, Jones C, Anav A, Liddicoat S, Knutti R. 2014. Uncertainties in CMIP5 Climate Projections due to Carbon Cycle Feedbacks. Journal of Climate 27.

  • Friedlingstein P, O’Sullivan M, Jones MW, Andrew RM, Hauck J, Olsen A, et al. 2020. Global Carbon Budget 2020. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12:3269–3340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaines KP, Stanley JW, Meinzer FC, McCulloh KA, Woodruff DR, Adams TS, Lin H, Eissenstat DM. 2015. Reliance on shallow soil water in a mixed-hardwood forest in central Pennsylvania. Tree Physiology 36:444–458.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Giasson MA, Ellison AM, Bowden RD, Crill PM, Davidson EA, Drake JE, Frey SD, Hadley JL, Lavine M, Melillo JM, Munger JW, Nadelhoffer KJ, Nicoll L, Ollinger SV, Savage KE, Steudler PA, Tang J, Varner RK, Wofsy SC, Foster DR, Finzi AC. 2013. Soil respiration in a northeastern US temperate forest: a 22-year synthesis. Ecosphere 4:140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Görres CM, Kammann C, Ceulemans R. 2016. Automation of soil flux chamber measurements: potentials and pitfalls. Biogeosciences 13:1949–1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Q. 2019. SSHCZO Digital Elevation Model (DEM), GIS/Map Data, Land Cover, LiDAR, Soil Survey—Shale Hills (2010). HydroShare. https://www.hydroshare.org/resource/cea8dda7b8c64f76aaaf412d8d37f041/#citation

  • Hanson PJ, Wullschleger SD, Bohlman SA, Todd DE. 1993. Seasonal and topographic patterns of forest floor CO2 efflux from an upland oak forest. Tree Physiology 13:1–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hasenmueller EA, Jin L, Stinchcomb GE, Lin H, Brantley SL, Kaye JP. 2015. Topographic controls on the depth distribution of soil CO2 in a temperate watershed. Applied Geochemistry 63:58–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto S, Carvalhais N, Ito A, Migliavacca M, Nishina K, Reichstein M. 2015. Global spatiotemporal distribution of soil respiration modeled using a global database. Biogeosciences 12(13):4121–4132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He Y. 2019. Understanding the Carbon Cycle in Complex Terrain at the Shale Hills Critical Zone Observatory. [Dissertation.] The Pennsylvania State University.

  • Hodges C, Kim H, Brantley SL, Kaye JP. 2019. Soil CO2 and O2 Concentrations Illuminate the Relative Importance of Weathering and Respiration to Seasonal Soil Gas Fluctuation. Soil Science Society of America Journal 83:1167–1180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman AL, Kemanian AR, Forest CE. 2018. Analysis of climate signals in the crop yield record of sub-Saharan Africa. Global Change Biology 24:143–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hufkens K. 2021. ‘daymeter.’ https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/daymetr/index.html.

  • Jassal RS, Black AT, Novak MD, Gaumont-Guay D, Nesic Z. Effect of soil water stress on soil respiration and its temperature sensitivity in an 18-year-old temperate Douglas-fir stand. Global Change Biology 14: 1305–1318.

  • Jian J, Vargas R, Anderson-Teixeira KJ, Stell E, Herrmann V, Horn M, Kholod N, Manzon J, Marchesi R, Paredes D, Bond-Lamberty BP. 2021. A Global Data of Soil Respiration Data, Version 5.0. ORNL DAAC, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.

  • Jiang Y, Zhang B, Wang W, Li B, Wu Z, Chu C. 2020. Topography and plant community structure contribute to spatial heterogeneity of soil respiration in a subtropical forest. Science of the Total Environment 733.

  • Kettler TA, Doran JW, Gilbert TL. 2001. Simplified Method for Soil Particle-Size Determination to Accompany Soil-Quality Analyses. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65:849–852.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koster RD, Suarez MJ, Ducharne A, Stieglitz M, Kumar P. 2000. A catchment-based approach to modeling land surface processes in a general circulation model: 1. Model structure. Journal of Geophysical Research 105:809–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Quéré C, Andrew RM, Canadell JG, Sitch S, Ivar Korsbakken J, Peters GP, et al. 2016. Global Carbon Budget 2016. Earth System Science Data 8:2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin HS, Kogelmann W, Walker C, Bruns MA. 2006. Soil moisture patterns in a forested catchment: A hydropedological perspective. Geoderma 131:345–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin H. 2019. SSHCZO—Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), Geology, GIS/Map Data—GPR Bedrock Elevation GIS Data—Shale Hills (2008). HydroShare. https://www.hydroshare.org/resource/ee157df1b4c84799a2d2c748d3a0b679/#citation.

  • Liu Q, Edwards NT, Post WM, Gu L, Ledford J, Lenhart S. 2006. Temperature-independent diel variation in soil respiration observed from a temperate deciduous forest. Global Change Biology 12:2136–2145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd J, Taylor JA. 1994. On the Temperature Dependence of Soil Respiration. Functional Ecology 8:315–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lou Y, Zhou X, editors. 2006. Soil Respiration and the Environment. Elsevier.

  • Lovett GM, Turner MG, Jones CG, Weathers KC, editors. 2005. Ecosystem Function in Heterogeneous Landscapes. Springer.

  • Lu H, Li S, Ma M, Bastrikov V, Chen X, Ciais P, Dai Y, Ito A, Ju W, Lienert S, Lombardozzi D, Lu X, Maignan F, Nakhavali M, Quine T, Schindlbacher A, Wang J, Wang Y, Wårlind D, Zhang S, Yuan W. 2021. Comparing machine learning-derived global estimates of soil respiration and its components with those from terrestrial ecosystem models. Environmental Research Letters 16:054048.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Makita N, Kosugi Y, Sakabe A, Kanazawa A, Ohkubo S, Tani M. 2018. Seasonal and diurnal patterns of soil respiration in an evergreen coniferous forest: Evidence from six years of observation with automatic chambers. Plosone 13:e0192622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao J, Ricciuto DM, Thornton PE, Warren JM, King AW, Shi X, Iversen CM, Norby RJ. 2016. Evaluating the Community Land Model in a Pine Stand with Shading Manipulations and 13CO2 Labeling. Biogeosciences 13:641–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DW, Sommers LE. 1996. Total Carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic Matter. Sparks DL, ed. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3. Chemical Methods. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy. p961–1010.

  • Ning L, Mann ME, Crane R, Wagener T, Najjar RG, Singh R. 2012. Probabilistic Projections of Anthropogenic Climate Change Impacts on Precipitation for the Mid-Atlantic Region of the United States. Journal of Climate 25:5273–5291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA. 2007. US divisional and station climatic data and normal. Natl. Clim. Data Ctr., Asheville, NC.

  • NOAA. 2021. Climate at a Glance: Statewide Time Series. www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/statewide/time-series/36/pcp/ann/1/1895-2021?base_prd=true&begbaseyear=1901&endbaseyear=2000.

  • Orr, AS. 2016. Topographic controls on root partitioning patterns in a temperate forest. [Master's thesis]. The Pennsylvania State University.

  • Pacific VJ, McGlynn BL, Riveros-Iregui DA, Welsh DL, Epstein HE. 2008. Variability in Soil Respiration across Riparian-Hillslope Transitions. Biogeochemistry 91:51–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pacific VJ, McGlynn BL, Riveros-Iregui DA, Welsch DL, Epstein HE. 2011. Landscape structure, groundwater dynamics, and soil water content influence soil respiration across riparian–hillslope transitions in the Tenderfoot Creek Experimental Forest, Montana. Hydrological Processes 25:811–827.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Papendick RI, Campbell GS. 1981. Theory and Measurement of Water Potential. In: Water Potential Relations in Soil Microbiology. Soil Science Society of America Special Publications Number 9 (eds Parr JF, Gardner WR, Elliot LF), 1–22. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, WI.

  • Petrakis S, Seyfferth A, Kan J, Inamdar S, Vargas R. 2017. Influence of experimental extreme water pulses on greenhouse gas emissions from soils. Biogeochemistry 133:147–164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips CL, Nickerson N, Risk D, Bond BJ. 2011. Interpreting diel hysteresis between soil respiration and temperature. Global Change Biology 17:515–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primka EJ, IV. 2021. Fine root dynamics and their effect on soil CO2 efflux across a forested landscape with complex topography. [Dissertation]. The Pennsylvania State University.

  • Primka EJ IV, Adams TS, Buck A, Eissenstat DM. 2021. Topographical shifts in fine root lifespan in a mixed, mesic temperate forest. PLoS ONE 16(7):e0254672.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Primka EJ, IV, Adams TS, Buck A, Eissenstat DM. 2022. Shifts in root dynamics along a hillslope in a mixed, mesic temperate forest. Plant and Soil: 1–17.

  • R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.

  • Reyes WM, Epstein HE, Li X, McGlynn BL, Riveros-Iregui DA, Emanuel RE. 2017. Complex terrain influences ecosystem carbon responses to temperature and precipitation. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 31.

  • Richardson AD, Hufkens K, Milliman T, Aurecht DM, Chen M, Gray JM, Johnston MR, Keenan TF, Klosterman ST, Kosmala M, Melaas EK, Friedl MA, Frolkin S. 2018. Tracking vegetation phenology across diverse North American biomes using PhenoCam imagery. Nature 5:180028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riveros-Iregui DA, McGlynn BL, Epstein HE, Welsch DL. 2008. Interpretation and evaluation of combined measurement techniques for soil CO2 efflux: Discrete surface chambers and continuous soil CO2 probes. Journal of Geophysical Research 113:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riveros-Iregui DA, McGlynn BL. 2009. Landscape structure control on soil CO2 efflux variability in complex terrain: Scaling from point observations to watershed scale fluxes. Journal of Geophysical Research 114.

  • Riveros-Iregui DA, McGlynn BL, Emanual RE, Epstein HE. 2012. Complex terrain leads to bidirectional responses of soil respiration to inter-annual water availability. Global Change Biology 18:749–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio VE, Detto M. 2017. Spatiotemporal variability of soil respiration in a seasonal tropical forest. Ecology and Evolution 7:7104–7116.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ruehr NK, Offermann CA, Gessler A, Winkler JB, Ferrio JP, Buchmann N, Barnard RL. 2009. Drought effects on allocation of recent carbon: From beech leaves to soil CO2 efflux. New Phytology 184(4):950–961.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruehr NK, Knohl A, Buchmann N. 2010. Environmental variables controlling soil respiration on diurnal, seasonal and annual time-scales in a mixed mountain forest in Switzerland. Biogeochemistry 98:153–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotach MW, Wohlfahart G, Hansel A, Reif M, Wagner J, Gohm A. 2014. The World is Not Flat: Implications for the Global Carbon Balance. American Meteorological Society.

  • Saha D, Basso B, Robertson GP. 2021. Machine learning improves predictions of agricultural nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from intensively managed cropping systems. Environmental Research Letters 16.

  • Savagae KE, Davidson EA. 2001. Interannual variation of soil respiration in two New England forests. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 0: 1–14.

  • Savage KE, Davidson EA. 2003. A comparison of manual and automated systems for soil CO2 flux measurements. Journal of Experimental Botany 54:891–899.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savage KE, Phillips RL, Davidson EA. 2014. High temporal frequency measurements of greenhouse gas emissions from soils. Biogeosciences 11:2709–2720.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger WH, Bernhardt E. 2013. Biogeochemistry, An Analysis of Global Change. Waltham, MA: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senar OE, Webster KL, Creed IF. 2018. Catchment-Scale Shifts in the Magnitude and Partitioning of Carbon Export in Response to Changing Hydrologic Connectivity in a Northern Hardwood Forest. JGR Biogeosciences 123:2337–2352.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Y, Baldwin DC, Davis KJ, Yu X, Duffy CJ, Lin H. 2015. Simulating high-resolution soil moisture patterns in the Shale Hills watershed using a land surface hydrologic model. Hydrological Processes 29:4624–4637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Y, Davis KJ, Duffy CJ, Yu X. 2013. Development of a coupled land surface hydrologic model and evaluation at a critical zone observatory. Journal of Hydrometeorology 14:1401–1420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Y, Eissenstat DM, He Y, Davis KJ. 2018. Using a spatially-distributed hydrologic biogeochemistry model with a nitrogen transport module to study the spatial variation of carbon processes in a Critical Zone Observatory. Ecological Modelling 380:8–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smeglin YH, Davis KJ, Shi Y, Eissenstat DM, Kaye JP, Kaye MW. 2020. Observing and Simulating Spatial Variations of Forest Carbon Stocks in Complex Terrain. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 125.

  • Smith L, Eissenstat DM, Kaye MW. 2017. Variability in aboveground carbon dynamics driven by slope aspect and curvature in an eastern deciduous forest, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 47:149–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman C. 1904. The proof and measurement of association between two things. American Journal of Psychology. 15:72–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strobl C, Boulesteix AL, Zeileis A, Horthorn T. 2007. Bias in Random Forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics 8.

  • Subin Z, Milly P, Sulman B, Malyshev S, Shevliakova E. 2014. Resolving terrestrial ecosystem processes along a subgrid topographic gradient for an earth-system model. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 11:8443–8492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan BW, Dore S, Kolb TE, Hart SC, Montes-Helu MC. 2010. Evaluation of methods for estimating soil carbon dioxide efflux across a gradient of forest disturbance. Global Change Biology.

  • Suseela V, Conant RT, Wallenstein MD, Dukes JS. 2012. Effects of soil moisture on the temperature sensitivity of heterotrophic respiration vary seasonally in an old-field climate change experiment. Global Change Biology 18:336–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Q, Wang D, Tang Y, Li Y, Wang M, Liao C, Liu F. 2019. Topographic controls on the variability of soil respiration in a humid subtropical forest. Biogeochemistry 145:177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarboton DG. 1997. A new method for the determination of flow directions and contributing areas in grid digital elevation models. Water Resour. Res. 33:309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton MM, Wei Y, Thornton PE, Shrestha R, Kao S, Wilson BE. 2020. Daymet: Station-Level Inputs and Cross-Validation Result for North America, Version 4. ORNL DAAC, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.

  • Throop HL, Archer SR, Monger HC, Waltman S. 2012. When bulk density methods matter: Implications for estimating soil organic carbon pools in rocky soils. Journal of Arid Environments 77:66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd-Brown KEO, Randerson JT, Post WM, Hoffman FM, Tarnocai C, Schuur EAG, Allison SD. 2013. Causes of variation in soil carbon simulations from CMIP5 Earth system models and comparison with observations. Biogeosciences 10.

  • van’T Hoff, JH. 1898. Sur la loi de dilution des sels. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas Belg. 17:370–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Hao Y, Cui XY, Zhao H, Xu C, Zhou X, Xu Z. 2014. Responses of soil respiration and its components to drought stress. Journals of Soils and Sediments 14:99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Lai X, Zhu Q, Castellano MJ, Yang G. 2019. Soil Type, Topography, and Land Use Interact to Control the Response of Soil Respiration to Climate Variation. Forests 10.

  • Xiao D, Li L. 2018. Shale Hills CZO Hourly Precipitation Total Data. Retrieved from http://www.czo.psu.edu/data_preciphour-sh2.html.

  • Xia Y, Mitchell K, Ek M, Sheffield J, Cosgrove B, Wood E, Luo L, Alonge C, Wei H, Meng J, Livneh B, Lettenmaier D, Koren V, Duan Q, Mo K, Fan Y, Mocko D. 2012. Continental-scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for the North American Land Data Assimilation System project phase 2 (NLDAS-2): 1. Intercomparison and application of model products. J. Geophys. Res. 117: D03109.

  • Yan T, Song H, Wang Z, Teramoto M, Wang J, Liang N, Ma Z, Sun Z, Zi Y, Li L, Peng S. Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration across multiple time scales in a temperate plantation forest. Science of the Total Environment 668: 479–485.

  • Yao ZS, Zheng XH, Xie BH, Liu CY, Mei BL, Dong HB, Butterbach-Bahl K, Zhu JG. 2009. Comparison of manual and automated chambers for field measurements of N2O, Ch4, CO2 fluxes from cultivated land. Atmospheric Environment 43:1888–1896.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Lange H, Meissner H. 2020. Gap-filling continuously-measured soil respiration data: A highlight of time-series-based methods. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 285.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This manuscript was improved by feedback from Drs. Elise Pendall, Ben Bond-Lamberty, and three anonymous peer reviewers. Financial support was provided by National Science Foundation Grant (award EAR—1331726) for the Susquehanna Shale Hills Critical Zone Observatory (SSHCZO), by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological & Environmental Research (award DE—SC0012003), and by Hatch Appropriations under Project PEN04571 and Accession 1003346. Manual soil CO2 efflux samples were collected by Alexandra Buck and Jeremy Harper. All data were collected from the SSHCZO field site, which is managed by Brandon Forsythe, within Penn State’s Stone Valley Forest, which is managed by staff of the Forestlands Management Office and funded by the Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences and Department of Ecosystem Science and Management. PhenoCam data are funded by the Northeastern States Research Cooperative, NSF’s Macrosystems Biology program (Awards EF–1065029 and EF–1702697), and DOE’s Regional and Global Climate Modeling program (Award DE–SC0016011). MK was funded by a USDA National Needs Fellowship from NIFA (Grant 2019–38420–28979) and trained on an NSF Research Traineeship (NSF-DGE NRT-INFEWS # 1828822).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marissa Kopp.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 394 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kopp, M., Kaye, J., Smeglin, Y.H. et al. Topography Mediates the Response of Soil CO2 Efflux to Precipitation Over Days, Seasons, and Years. Ecosystems 26, 687–705 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-022-00786-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-022-00786-1

Keywords

Navigation