Skip to main content

Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 and the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research

Synonyms

SIS and SS-QOL

Definition

The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) and the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life scale (SS-QOL) were developed in the United States to measure the quality of life of the stroke population. These two patient-centered outcome measures are the most comprehensive stroke-specific scales to be used for measuring health-related well-being of individuals recovering from stroke (Huang et al. 2013; Salter et al. 2008) and are also frequently used in stroke rehabilitation research studies (Kissela 2006; Lin et al. 2009a, b, 2010, 2011; Williams et al. 1999).

Description

Brief Historical Review for SIS 3.0 and SS-QOL

The SIS 3.0 was developed from the perspectives of patients as well as their caregivers to measure QOL (Duncan et al. 1999a, 2003). The current SIS 3.0 was created from the SIS 2.0 by removing some items that misfit the construct (Duncan et al. 2003). The original SIS was developed from unpublished data from Duncan et al. in 1999 (Duncan et al. 1999a). The...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boosman, H., Passier, P. E. C. A., Visser-Meily, J. M. A., Rinkel, G. J. E., & Post, M. W. N. (2010). Validation of the stroke specific quality-of-life scale in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 81, 485–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carod-Artal, F. J., Coral, L. F., Trizotto, D. S., & Moreira, C. M. (2008). The Stroke Impact Scale 3.0: Evaluation of acceptability, reliability and validity of the Brazilian version. Stroke, 39, 2477–2484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carod-Artal, F. J., Coral, L. F., Trizotto, D. S., & Moreira, C. M. (2009). Self- and Proxy-Report Agreement on the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke, 40, 3308–3314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Cruz, C., Martinez-Nuñez, J. M., Perez, M. E., Kravzov-Jinich, J., Ríos-Castañeda, C., & Altagracia-Martinez, M. (2013). Evaluation of the Stroke-Specific Quality-of-Life (SSQOL) Scale in Mexico: A Preliminary Approach. Value in Health Regional Issues, 2(3), 392–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2013.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, P. W., Wallace, D., Lai, S. M., et al. (1999a). The stroke impact scale version 2.0: Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke, 30, 2131–2140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, P. W., Bode, R. K., Lai, S. M., & Perera, S. (2003). Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The stroke impact scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 950–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, P., Reker, D., Kwon, S., Lai, S. M., Studenski, S., Perera, S., et al. (2005). Measuring stroke impact with the Stroke Impact Scale. Telephone versus mail administration in veterans with stroke. Medical Care, 43, 507–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, P. W., Wallace, D., Lai, S. M., et al. (1999b). The stroke impact scale version 2.0: Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke, 30, 2131–2140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewert, T., & Stucki, G. (2007). Validity of the SS-QOL in Germany and in survivors of hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 21, 161–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganvir, S., Harishch, M., & Kunde, C. (2018). Validation of Marathi version of stroke-specific quality of life. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 21(4), 290. Retrieved from https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A561099457/AONE?u=csudh&sid=AONE&xid=2846e6b8.

    Google Scholar 

  • HakverdioÄŸlu Yönt, G., & Khorshid, L. (2012). Turkish version of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale. International Nursing Review, 59(2), 274–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. H., Wu, C. Y., Hsieh, Y. W., & Lin, K. C. (2010). Predictors of change in quality-of-life after distributed constraint-induced therapy in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 24, 559–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. H., Wu, C. Y., Lin, K. C., Hsieh, Y. W., Snow, W. M., & Wang, T. N. (2013). Determinants of change in stroke-specific quality of life after distributed constraint-induced therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 54–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsueh, I. P., Jeng, J. S., Lee, Y., Sheu, C. F., & Hsieh, C. L. (2011). Construct validity of the stroke-specific quality-of-life questionnaire in ischemic stroke patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92, 1113–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kartsona, A., & Hilari, K. (2007). Quality of life in aphasia: Greek adaptation of the stroke and aphasia quality of life scale - 39 item (SAQOL-39). Europa Medicophysica, 43(1), 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiran, S., & Krishnan, G. (2013). Stroke and aphasia quality of life scale in Kannada-evaluation of reliability, validity and internal consistency.(Original Article). Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 16(3), 361–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kissela, B. (2006). The value of quality of life research in stroke. Stroke, 37, 1958–1959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legris, N., Devilliers, H., Daumas, A., Carnet, D., Charpy, J.-P., Bastable, P., … Béjot, Y. (2018). French validation of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QoL). Neurorehabilitation, 42(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-172178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima, R., Teixeira-Salmela, L., Magalhães, L., & Gomes-Neto, M. (2008). Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the stroke specific quality-of-life scale: Application of the Rasch model. Revista Brasileirade Fisioterapia, 12, 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, K. C., Chang, Y. F., Wu, C. Y., & Chen, Y. A. (2009a). Effects of constraint-induced therapy versus bilateral arm training on motor performance, daily functions and quality of life in stroke survivors. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23, 441–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, K. C., Fu, T., Wu, C. Y., & Hsieh, C. J. (2011). Assessing the stroke-specific quality of life for outcomes measurement in stroke rehabilitation: Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9, 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, K. C., Fu, T., Wu, C. Y., Hsieh, Y. W., Chen, C. L., & Lee, P. C. (2010). Psychometric comparisons of the stroke impact scale 3.0 and stroke specific quality-of-life scale. Quality of Life Research, 19, 435–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, K. C., Wu, C. Y., Liu, J. S., Chen, Y. T., & Hsu, C. J. (2009b). Constraint-induced therapy versus dose-matched control intervention to improve motor ability, basic/extended daily functions and quality of life in stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23, 160–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macisaac, R., Ali, M., Peters, M., English, C., Rodgers, H., Jenkinson, C., … Quinn, T. J. (2016). Derivation and Validation of a Modified Short Form of the Stroke Impact Scale. Journal of the American Heart Association, 5(5). https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.115.003108.

  • Mahmoodi, M., Safari, A., Vossoughi, M., Golbon-Haghighi, F., Kamali-Sarvestani, M., Ghaem, H., & Borhani-Haghighi, A. (2015). Stroke specific quality of life questionnaire: Test of reliability and validity of the Persian version. Iranian Journal of Neurology, 14(2), 94–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, I., & Krishnan, G. (2015). Adaptation and validation of stroke-aphasia quality of life (SAQOL-39) scale to Hindi. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 18(1), 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muus, I., Christensen, D., Petzold, M., Harder, I., Johnsen, S. P., Kirkevold, M., et al. (2011). Responsiveness and sensitivity of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Danish version. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(25–26), 2425–2433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muus, I., Williams, L. S., & Ringsberg, K. C. (2007). Validation of the stroke specific quality of life scale (SS-QOL): Test of reliability and validity of the Danish version (SS-QOL-DK). Clinical Rehabilitation, 21, 620–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odetunde, M. O., Akinpelu, A. O., & Odole, A. C. (2017). Validity and reliability of a Nigerian-Yoruba version of the stroke-specific quality of life scale 2.0. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15(1), 205. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0775-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, S. G., Heiberg, G. A., Nielsen, J. F., Friborg, O., Stabel, H. H., Anke, A., & Arntzen, C. (2018). Validity, reliability and Norwegian adaptation of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL) scale. SAGE Open Medicine, 6, 2050312117752031. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117752031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2009). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Person/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, M. W. M., Boosman, H., Zandvoort, M. M., Passier, P. E. C. A., Rinkel, G. J. E., & Visser-Meily, J. M. A. (2011). Development and validation of a short version of the stroke specific quality-of-life scale. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 82, 283–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raju, R., & Krishnan, G. (2015). Adaptation and validation of stroke-aphasia quality of life (SAQOL-39) scale to Malayalam. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 18(4), 441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, K., Jutai, H., Zettler, L., Moses, M., McClure, A., Foley, N., et al. (2011). Outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation. The evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation (EBRSR) reviews current practices in stroke rehabilitation. Retrieved from http://www.ebrsr.com/uploads/Module-21_outcomes.pdf. Accessed 17 Feb 2012.

  • Salter, K. L., Moses, M. B., Foley, N. C., & Teasell, R. W. (2008). Health-related quality of life after stroke: What are we measuring? International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 31, 111–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schepers, V. P. M., Ketelaar, M., Van De Port, I. G. L., Visser-Meily, M. A., & Lindeman, E. (2007). Comparing contents of functional outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29, 221–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. S., Bakas, T., Brizendine, E., Plue, L., Tu, W., Hendrie, H., & Kroenke, K. (2006). How Valid Are Family Proxy Assessments of Stroke Patients’ Health-Related Quality of Life? Stroke, 37(8), 2081–2085. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000230583.10311.9f.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. S., Weinberger, M., Harris, L. E., Clark, D. O., & Biller, J. (1999). Development of a stroke-specific quality-of-life scale. Stroke, 30, 1362–1369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, G. K. C., Lam, S. W., Ngai, K., Wong, A., Poon, W. S., & Mok, V. (2013). Development of a short form of Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale for patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 335(1), 204–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2013.09.033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ching-yi Wu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Huang, Yh., Wu, Cy., Lin, Kc. (2021). Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 and the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale. In: Maggino, F. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_3830-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_3830-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69909-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69909-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics